You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: TOTAL ANARCHY

in FreeSpeech4 years ago

I'm may need to chew on your premises a bit more but I think we are in concurrence for the most part.

Def not an advocate for anarchy but do see the weaknesses of crony capitalism.

Oh and don't get me started on corporate misuse of intellectual property laws. My brother just posted something on FB about Apple suing Samsung because they patented rounded corners on phones. That is fucking ridiculous.

I'm sure there are a ton of frivolous intellectual property lawsuits and the way they are used today really imo stifles individual human creativity and innovation.

Corporations obviously have the legal muscle that they can crush people using these laws. And ofc the system is flawed in that if you don't have the $$$, good chance things will not go in your favor.

Now, it goes without saying that the system works less than optimally for the people but tbh I don't think we have a better alternative currently. Then again, perhaps it's not necessarily the system design that is fucked up but the corruption of many elected officials we have running it.

Appreciate the thought provoking post!

Sort:  

Pushing towards anarchy does not make globalism disappear. So, promoting anarchy is a mechanism for minimizing government. Hypothetically, actual anarchy would be dangerous and even the fake news is right about that. Globalists can cry that anarchy will bring us chaos and they are not wrong. But it is hypothetical because we always have governments coming and going of all sizes. Your head is the government of your body. The father is the government of a family, and so on and so forth. There are power vacuums where power comes up when other governments go down. Governments always try to get bigger and bigger, as in too big. Pressing toward anarchy means countering the press that too many people have towards 1984 authoritarianism, totalitarianism, plutocracy, corporatism, technocracy, fascism, tyranny, globalism, etc.

Then again, perhaps it's not necessarily the system design that is fucked up but the corruption of many elected officials we have running it.

You can't blame individuals for a systemic failure.

Scapegoating individuals only preserves faith in a shockingly unfair foundation.

As we slowly transition to AI oversight, I believe the systemic errors (primary axioms) will be much more difficult to hide.

Click to watch 13 minutes,

Wow, dude. You gave me a lot to chew on. I'll take a look. Thanks!

Off-topic,

I have a friend running a small debate website and I'm looking for information that I could give them to help them leverage HIVE for data storage like user icons and forum posts so they could be saved to the HIVE blockchain instead of paying a monthly fee for traditional data storage.

You seem like someone who might be knowledgeable on the subject, would you be willing to point me in the right direction?

I would look into using SiaCoin Skynet for that. Been thinking about it for a few projects

Corporations obviously have the legal muscle that they can crush people using these laws. And ofc the system is flawed in that if you don't have the $$$, good chance things will not go in your favor.

Laws that protect the RICH from the POOR are both redundant and insane.

Now, it goes without saying that the system works less than optimally for the people but tbh I don't think we have a better alternative currently.

CONSTITUTIONAL HOLACRACY looks promising.