Thought u were replying to a different post when I made the comparison, seems like some peojects seem to just use the reports as a cover to do shadier more selfish things that don't really bring a lot of value to Hive, just more rewards to them.
I've just been thinking this for a while and this post reminded me of it, as there are curation reports that have automatic votes.
Maybe in OCD it can be justified by the amount of authors that vote, but smaller project that two out of ten 100% votes are kept by them, I don't like it very much.
A good rule of thumb for us has been 10-20%, depending on the initiatives it can be more such as running the @lovesniper curation for instance is very time consuming and exhausting due to so many scam attempts and other activities the curators undergo such as leaving comments suggesting communities they may be interested in, following the genuine looking ones to curate them more later, etc.
Main point is to use common sense and fair rewards, comparing this to ocd for instance it would be as if we only used 10-20% of our voting power curating posts and then the rest trading votes with others who would vote our reports back, or even worse our personal accounts.
Thought u were replying to a different post when I made the comparison, seems like some peojects seem to just use the reports as a cover to do shadier more selfish things that don't really bring a lot of value to Hive, just more rewards to them.
I've just been thinking this for a while and this post reminded me of it, as there are curation reports that have automatic votes.
Maybe in OCD it can be justified by the amount of authors that vote, but smaller project that two out of ten 100% votes are kept by them, I don't like it very much.
A good rule of thumb for us has been 10-20%, depending on the initiatives it can be more such as running the @lovesniper curation for instance is very time consuming and exhausting due to so many scam attempts and other activities the curators undergo such as leaving comments suggesting communities they may be interested in, following the genuine looking ones to curate them more later, etc.
Main point is to use common sense and fair rewards, comparing this to ocd for instance it would be as if we only used 10-20% of our voting power curating posts and then the rest trading votes with others who would vote our reports back, or even worse our personal accounts.