Since man had the ability to think and ask himself some questions about the existence of the universe and everything around it, many of these questions have not been answered today from a scientific point of view with a demonstrative basis, so we can not say that these questions are things of the past, all this makes that today we still think about the following questions:
What is the exact origin of everything we know?
In particular, I think that this question could be expanded a little more, since looking for a scientifically based explanation to explain the origin of what we know is not enough, since matter can exist outside human limits that we do not know but that still needs to be explained.
I have heard the theory of the big bang, but it is something that personally does not convince me, since it is not explained with certainty how an event in the cosmos could occur as that explosion that could be born from nothing.
Now, once we take into account that explosion, if we could understand the existence as such and the origin of the universe, but we can only do that from the big bang, but before the big bang certain enigmas are still closed, since we are all clear that nothing produces.
When I think about these arguments I reflect and think: could it be that there is an imaginary borderline that separates science from philosophy?
Logically, we have been taught that this is not so, we even know that science is a branch of philosophy, but we must be more flexible and think more about the things that have not been able to have a logical explanation in all this existential core.
Let's analyze another question that helps us to broaden this context even more:
Is the existence of humanity in the universe meant to fulfill some specific objective?
Logically, it is normal that any of us would think about some objective of our existence in the universe.
This reasoning in the personal comes to mind once I think about how apparently isolated we are in the universe, even if we think about the case that we are not the only intelligent biological species in the universe as well we have to think about this question.
If we start out with nothing generating nothing, then humanity cannot be part of an ecosystem where we are only born, live a life where we generate more lives, but in the end all those human lives will come to an end called death.
We are created in the universe as if we are part of a system where we are sent to live in order to gather experiences that will serve us as learning for a second or multiple lives, but who has demonstrated these supposed objectives?
To this day, and as far as I am aware, no one has demonstrated them. In fact, I do not know if when I die, perhaps after death, it is the physical and spiritual plane that may exist after death that will give me answers to these two questions that I have discussed throughout this analysis, questions that, by the way, seem quite simple to answer but that may have an answer and multiple demonstrations outside this life as we know it.
Conclusion
All this analysis makes me reflect on the importance of philosophy to focus our bases of a different knowledge, a knowledge more attached to the philosophy of unanswered questions, but that not far from a scientific reality we can see all the efforts that have been made and that will continue to be made to give answers to these great enigmas.
It would be very important for me that you can give your opinion on this subject, even if you can formulate other questions that help to expand these enigmas of our vast universe would be very good to diversify the ideas discussed here.
Until a next delivery, your friend @carlos84 says goodbye.
Greetings partner, I agree with you, we must not separate science from philosophy, as human beings the evolution of knowledge has shown a new horizon of seeing science, well in the different disciplines, since everything is about pir what happens Including social indole, it adjusts to the handling of assumptions in order to respond to seeking a more certain truth because there is no absolute truth.
This post has been manually curated by @bala41288 from Indiaunited community. Join us on our Discord Server.
Do you know that you can earn a passive income by delegating to @indiaunited. We share 80 % of the curation rewards with the delegators.
Here are some handy links for delegations: 100HP, 250HP, 500HP, 1000HP.
Read our latest announcement post to get more information.
Please contribute to the community by upvoting this comment and posts made by @indiaunited.
Greetings @carlos84, it is difficult to conceive of science without the use of philosophical principles, even knowing that great of our eminences in science historically speaking were considered great philosophers. Great contribution you share with us.
Certainly my friend and esteemed professor, it is difficult to conceive of science without the philosophical principles that marked our ancient history linked to the great scientific contributions of the past.
Hi @carlos84
Wow, the origin of what we know,
The detail of studying that question is in the plural, we know?
It is better to silver the origin of what I know.
And that answer is easier because from there you can answer the origin of what we know.
that set of wisdom lies in the sum of what you know and what other people know individually.
Everything you have said is of great importance in revealing the origin of everything we know but do not know its exact origin. Greetings my dear friend @lanzjoseg
We can say that through our mother philosophy man has been able to decipher enigmas associated with any type of knowledge related to both our universe and our own existence.
Thanks friend for such an interesting approach. Successes.
Certainly my friend @rbalzan79 philosophy has helped us a lot and I even think that we are going to have to keep looking for its deepest roots to find much more answers to old and new enigmas. Greetings and thanks for commenting
Upvoted 👌 (Mana: 20/30) Liquid rewards.