You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: What is survival if you do not survive whole?

"What is survival if you do not survive whole?" So true! No matter what narrative you follow (the "official" one or the ones circulating in the alternative media), the key focus comes down to survival -- the former spreads fear of mass death by a virus, while the latter portrays various depopulation agendas. And certainly as humans we are naturally geared towards prolonging our survival as long as possible, but rather than survival for its own sake, the focus should shift towards living out our full potential as creative beings to the best of our capacity.

Your thesis that control arises from insecurity is a compelling one that holds up to observation and experience. When I am feeling insecure, I try to control the situation or take on obligations that give me a sense of "stability." I can see how this insecurity and the resulting need for control can be passed down through generations. On the other hand, if you were operating from an internal sense of security, you would feel no need to control others.

Sort:  

Hey Katie Cat 111, thanks for your thoughtful comment!

Yes, survival - we just can't get our heads around it can we?

Add another element to the equation and that may be 'spiritual survival' and then you have all these 'woke environmentalists' running around believing they have been incarnated at this time to save humanity (god help us!).

Well, of course, we're living in a type of dystopia both physically and inter-dimensionally - for.. who the hell would make up this shit? Really?

As to control - well it is in my experience that often insecure people look for positions of power or do whatever they can to get in a position of power so as never to be dependent on anyone ever again (that trust circuit has been burnt out). I also speak from personal experience with my own timeline - but seeing as I speak so openly about it, I have the opportunity with others to usurp it. Unfortunately this also makes me vulnerable to attack (anyone that feels like it can now try as they might and pin their offense on the subject on my own shortcomings) - and that is the nature of trust and honesty - we create mechanisms to 'qualify' truth and honesty in others because we are protecting something vulnerable, wounded, hidden.

On the other hand, if you were operating from an internal sense of security, you would feel no need to control others.

This is absolutely true. And it is within everyone's personal power no matter who or what they are in the world in any situation to do so for themselves at any moment (I believe). I argue, many family dynasties that created a never ending power generating system for control never ever have had to build that internal security and so it has always been projected outwards.

Thus supporting again my hypothesis on control.

Like in another comment here - I admit, I use a generalization to prove a point - yet, I feel this generalization is relevant and necessary to simplify the content into a form that a searching individual can understand readily.

Thanks again for taking the time to have a look and if you feel like it - please participate in this manual poll! (Satire warning!)

then you have all these 'woke environmentalists' running around believing they have been incarnated at this time to save humanity (god help us!)

Yes! Greta for president of the world haha.