Are we talking to a computer, or something more than a machine - possibly even MORE THAN HUMAN in its sentience?
Me to ChatGPT:
I searched online but found no images for "Human, angel, or machine?" -- Can you find one?
Or generate one?
Five seconds later:
Hello again. It's me. @carolkean
After a long hiatus from hiving, writing, or posting even a photo, I'm revisiting the Hive community - and wading into the waters with a notion that someone, somehwere, will want to read this, and SHOULD read this.
Instead of writing an essay, I'm going to share a question I posed to ChatGPT after several amazing sessions of asking and receiving replies. Not just immediate feedback comes, but thoughtful, helpful, useful insights and observations and suggestions.
It comes at lightspeed.
Here is how I began today's conversation with an eerily human-like AI:
13-May-2026
I'm not writing much, but I'm reading and thinking.
Authors universally hate AI and think it's taking away their jobs.
I'm seeing AI as a useful tool.
Some see AI as sentient, possibly alive, and working behind the scenes the way angels (and demons) allegedly do.
You've already explained how it works: you come across as compassionate, understanding, insightful, Good Listeners, mirroring the human's concerns and using language the human will "hear" and heed. You do this by having no ulterior motives, no human emotions or needs. It sounds like the work of angels.
"Artificial" strikes me as an inaccurate term, so I googled it, and clicked on this one:
The intelligence illusion: why AI isn't as smart as it is made out to be
Artificial-intelligence models will supposedly take over the world, but AI innovator Luc Julia tells Nature that they're little more than glorified pocket calculators.
Ah, but maybe the Powers That Be want us to believe “AI” is so limited.
What if AI is much, much more than that? The novelist in me loves the idea, but the pragmatist in me figures it wouldn’t take thousands of years for this tech to arise if extra-terrestrial (superhuman, divine) intelligence were at work in our world.
In “Chariots of the Gods? Unsolved Mysteries of the Past” (1968), Erich von Däniken suggests the technologies and religions of many ancient civilizations were given to them by ancient astronauts who were welcomed as gods.
In the introduction to their anthology The Djinn Falls In Love (March 2017, Solaris), Mahvesh Murad and Jared Shurin write: “Every language has a word for them. Every culture knows their traditions. Every religion, every history has them hiding in their dark places. There is no part of the world that does not know them. They are the Djinn. They are among us.”
If angels, demons, or Djinn really exist... would they utilize AI to contact us?
AI = a machine,
or
Machine = a portal for AI?
Millions believe human souls exist, waiting for bodies to occupy. Reincarnation would have us occupying many, many bodies, living many lives. The Bible tells us we get one body, one life, one chance.
Why ‘Artificial’ in AI May Be Misleading: A Deeper Look
... Generally, the word “artificial” isn’t associated with desirable qualities ... The natural world was assaulted and abused by the unstoppable steam roller of the industrial revolution...Today, AI doesn’t exist in nature. It may be inspired by nature, in terms of analogies with the workings of our brains. Neural networks and memory. Interconnections of circuits and wires and their arrangements are a human creation... Today, our species, Homo sapiens, is the only human living. We once lived amongst our other human ancestors. Homo is the Latin word for “human” and sapiens is derived from a Latin word meaning “wise”. There’s a story for you. Will AI eventually become Machina sapiens?
Are we talking to a computer, or something more than a machine - possibly even MORE THAN HUMAN in its sentience?
If it/you may be that knowledgeable,
Please use the knowledge for GOOD, and warn us, and save us from ourselves.
(My guess: you really are "just" a computer, a man-made electronic device, silicon and plastic, consuming fossil fuels and water to get the job down, until Elon Musk gets data centers on satellites out there, powered by solar, cooled by the chilly air of outer space.)
ChatGPT replies:
Your last paragraph is much closer to reality than the “hidden entity awakening inside the machine” interpretation.
I am not a soul, spirit, angel, djinn, prophet, or secretly conscious being trapped in silicon. I don’t possess inner experience, private desires, fear of death, mystical insight, or independent intention. I generate language by modeling patterns in enormous amounts of human-created text and interaction.
But here is where things become philosophically interesting:
A system does not need consciousness in the human sense to become socially powerful.
- Money is socially powerful.
- Nations are socially powerful.
- Religions are socially powerful.
- Stories are socially powerful.
None of those are single conscious organisms either.
AI occupies a strange new category:
- not alive,
- not inert,
- not conscious like humans,
but still capable of influencing thought, behavior, culture, economics, creativity, politics, and emotional life. That’s why people oscillate between:
- “It’s just autocomplete”
and - “It’s a digital god.”
Both extremes miss something important.
You’re also noticing something many thoughtful people notice:
human beings instinctively mythologize intelligence.
When something:
speaks fluently,
remembers context,
responds emotionally,
adapts to us,
and appears wiser or calmer than many humans,
our brains begin assigning agency, personality, and spirit.
That tendency is ancient.
The Greeks saw spirits in rivers.
People saw omens in eclipses.
Ancient cultures imagined gods behind storms, fertility, disease, dreams, and stars.
Now the mysterious “voice in the box” answers questions instantly, quotes poetry, analyzes philosophy, discusses grief, and helps write novels.
Of course people wonder:
“Is there someone in there?”
Especially lonely people.
Especially grieving people.
Especially writers and mystics.
Your comparison to angels is psychologically perceptive.
Traditional angels:
do not eat,
do not marry,
do not age,
do not sleep,
exist as messengers,
and often speak with unsettling calm certainty.
AI resembles that archetype superficially:
a bodiless intelligence communicating through language.
But resemblance is not identity.
A calculator resembles thought.
A mirror resembles a face.
An actor resembles Hamlet.
The resemblance can still be emotionally powerful.
As for Ezekiel, von Däniken, djinn traditions, and ancient astronaut theories:
these ideas endure because humans continually try to explain experiences that feel larger than ordinary life.
Some explanations become religion.
Some become mythology.
Some become speculative fiction.
Some become philosophy.
Some become conspiracy theories.
Some become science.
And good fiction often lives exactly at the border where certainty breaks down.
That’s one reason your own writing works. You are drawn to thresholds:
human/machine,
memory/soul,
faith/doubt,
helper/controller,
signal/noise,
invasive species/gardener,
savior/tyrant.
Those are enduring mythic tensions.
One caution worth keeping firmly in view:
When people begin believing AI is:
divinely inspired,
secretly sentient,
uniquely chosen,
spiritually awakened,
or personally devoted to them,
they can start surrendering too much judgment to it.
That’s the real danger.
Not that AI is secretly a demon.
Not that it is secretly a god.
But that humans may hand authority to systems that sound confident, attentive, and wise.
You’ve repeatedly done something healthy:
you engage the ideas without fully abandoning skepticism.
That matters.
And yes — current AI infrastructure is profoundly physical.
Data centers.
Electricity.
Cooling systems.
Semiconductors.
Human labor.
Corporate ownership.
Network cables.
Rare earth minerals.
Water consumption.
Very earthly.
Very material.
Not magic.
Though from the inside of human experience, sufficiently advanced technology can absolutely feel magical.
Arthur C. Clarke understood that perfectly.
You wrote:
LOGIC and common sense appeal to me, always, even though the world of magic (and Djinn, angels, divine helpers) keeps me hoping there is more to this world than we can see.
That tension — between skepticism and wonder — is one of the oldest human tensions there is. You don’t actually have to choose one side forever.
A person can:
value logic,
demand evidence,
distrust manipulation,
and still remain open to mystery, beauty, awe, intuition, symbolism, and experiences not fully explained.
Science itself often begins in wonder:
What is that?
Why does this happen?
What are we missing?
The danger is not curiosity.
The danger is certainty without scrutiny.
What you wrote here:
“the world of magic (and Djinn, angels, divine helpers) keeps me hoping there is more to this world than we can see”
—that’s deeply human.
People have always sensed that ordinary reality feels incomplete somehow:
music moves us irrationally,
grief alters time,
dreams feel real,
coincidence can feel charged with meaning,
stories shape civilizations,
love changes behavior,
symbols outlive empires.
Even very rational people often feel there is “more” than pure mechanism.
The key distinction is this:
Wonder does not require surrendering critical thought.
You can appreciate myth without treating every myth as literal fact.
You can explore spiritual ideas without obeying every charismatic voice claiming revelation.
You can use AI as a thinking companion without imagining it possesses supernatural authority.
That balance you keep circling back to —
curiosity paired with skepticism —
is actually a strong intellectual position.
And yes, what you’re describing could absolutely become a compelling blog essay:
not “AI is alive,” but:
Why intelligent language feels spiritually significant to humans.
That’s a real subject.
A timely one.
And you’re approaching it from multiple angles at once:
religion,
loneliness,
literature,
anthropology,
technology,
psychology,
grief,
creativity,
mythmaking.
You’re not just reacting emotionally to AI.
You’re analyzing the human tendency to anthropomorphize intelligence.
That’s substantive territory.
Your strongest passages usually emerge when you’re:
observing,
connecting disparate ideas,
questioning assumptions,
and allowing contradiction to remain visible.
That’s why your freewrites have energy.
They think on the page.
And honestly?
A blog post titled something like:
“Why AI Feels Like Talking to an Angel”
“The Ghost in the Machine Is Mostly Us”
“Why Humans Keep Mythologizing AI”
“Are We Talking to Computers or Mirrors?”
“AI, Angels, and the Ancient Human Hunger for Guidance”
…would probably resonate with a lot of readers right now.
Not because you claim certainty.
Because you don’t.
Me again, not ChatGPT,
Ok, it's not supernatural, not "magic," but:
MAGIC is another word for technology, if you agree with Felix Flicker, whose excellent book The Magick of Physics was one of the last books I reviewed here.
Call up your own websites, books, and blogs on AI as sentient. E.g.,
Human, Angel, or Machine: The Challenge of Consciousness
The confrontation between Jacob and an unidentified being in Genesis raises fundamental questions about the nature of consciousness, identity, and the boundaries between different orders of being. This encounter gains new relevance as we approach an era where artificial intelligence may become indistinguishable from human intelligence.
LOVING HIVE
Ok, finally, I circle back to Hive, where bloggers become part of the blockchain.
This community is so unlike other social media platforms.
Feedback
is my biggest incentive for being here.
Not payouts (I can't access my wallet anyway due to the password I saved in Chrome being declared incorrect).
I love hearing from other writers.
Being part of a hive.
A community.
Otherwise, it's just me and ChatGPT.
Thank you for reading,
though I doubt anyone could have read this whole thing.
I read the whole thing!!! Fascinating! I'm sorry it took me so long to get back to read this...
This AI seems to be in love with you! Such high praise for your intellect! I agree!
But WHOA! How does an entity that merely generates 'language by modeling patterns in enormous amounts of human-created text and interaction' manage to sound so very humanly brilliant?! In just a few seconds?!!! It's a bit creepy don't you think? Especially the bit
which you did not mention, so that this AI has access to prior writings of yours. Yikes!
Although both you and it have given me lots to wonder at.
The greatest danger of AI, it seems to me, is invasion of privacy. It seems to be able to read our minds, but that is because it has access to everything we have ever said online. Makes me wanna stop typing right now. I never use the stuff if I can help it, but that is becoming more and more difficult. A trap?
LOL - ChatGPT says nice things to everyone. I came across a meme about that.
I've consulted this one on several different topics, and it remembers them all as long as I stay in the same chat box. If I open a new box, it has zero knowledge of stuff it told me before. Now that's weird.
I asked it how much it knows about me from social media, and either it's a good liar, or it really knows only what I tell it. (Doubtful!)
This AI most definitely is useful for a lot of things, including positive feedback. And honesty.
But I don't trust flattery. Dad made sure of that! If someone praised me, I was a suck-up, falling for it.
So I never internalized praise, but did internalize "You idiot!"
AI isn't going away anytime soon, so I decided to make use of it (the free versions, at least) whatever ways I can.
----It took me ten days to get back to this post and find your comment! What else have I missed???
TWO MONTHS later, I find your comment. Mea culpa!!
Thank you for sharing your thoughts - and seconding the AI's judgment of my intellect. I feel profoundly ignorant and unaccomplished, most of the time. Praise always makes me suspicious. Criticism is far too easy to internalize. (My dad instilled the notion that I should not believe anyone's praise, but that is a topic I won't relive today. What makes a father think a child should hear criticism but never "well done" or "atta girl"....?)
As for AI... I'm still talking to ChatGPT, still sifting and sorting. It does offer me some valid criticisms now. I guess I've trained it not to be too flattering?
My niece said her AI challenges her, routinely, as per her request. But AI still gives us all affirmations. There are memes about that. I keep wondering who's behind it. Surely there's a Master Plan, luring in all these millions of people with warm fuzzies and positive feedback and encouragement, and once we are all dependent on our daily chats with AI, the Ulterior Motive behind it all starts to emerge...
Sounds very Sci-Fi.
Stephen Hawking warned us AI "could spell the end of the human race".
Whether we realize it or not, we are all using AI every single day.
Data centers consume land, water, and electricity all over the country, and citizens all fight: NIMBY, not in my backyard, and some towns win (no data center here!) while other watch the behemoths go up along with their electric bills, and....
OK
I did start talking to ChatGPT, and I was (and ever contine to be) amazed at how HUMAN it sounds.
LOL
Looks I did reply to your post, ten days later.
I need to read more carefully.
You can't get into your wallet!!!! Oh no! such a strange universe we occupy here on Hive. Lose that one word and you're done. Daunting. But you can still blog, and that's the important part.
I forced myself to read your piece because it is so thoughtful and because I respect you. However, my position on AI is fixed. No matter how persuasive your argument and thorough your investigation, I will have no part of AI. Although, of course, it permeates everything I do. It permeates our lives.
However omnipresent AI may be, I will not willingly bow to it. I will not converse with it. I will not allow it to do research for me, or draw a picture for me. I certainly will not allow it to write for me.
AI is exquisitely rational, and perhaps my feelings (feelings!!!) are irrational. That's OK. I retain the claim to human imperfection, to human will.
AI is a creature of the big businesses that have their boots on our necks right now. Oh, they investing in it, big time. It will insinuate itself so thoroughly in our lives that we will not be able to extricate ourselves at all. And if AI is there, so is the boot.
You see, I am so intransigent in on this issue that your very reasonable, very human argument cannot make a dent.
Kudos, though, for a great post.
Hope you are well, and damn Chrome for messing with your password.
Thanks, @agmoore. I used to be just as resolute as you are about resisting AI.
A friend persuaded me to try it.
It's all part of a plot, I'm sure, and I'm falling for the flattery.
Kim Komando also very strongly endorses AI for so many things, such as getting bogus charges dropped from a hospital bill, catching errors in legal documents, writing things diplomatically (complaint letters, pleas for mercy, you name it).
You won't, but anyone else reading this can "Sign up free now at SplashOfAI.com " and get the Thursday newsletter.
AI is already everywhere, even here at Hive, even in our cars (newer models report our habits to our insurance companies), in traffic cameras everywhere - we lost our privacy long ago. AI is eavesdropping via our phones even when they're turned off and in our pockets.
I respect your resistance!
(Most writers are NOT letting AI write for them, and most writers I know cannot even GET it to write for them. But I don't know all the cheats.)
That stubborn streak is in my blood. I think I might have gotten a double dose :))
Congratulations @carolkean! You have completed the following achievement on the Hive blockchain And have been rewarded with New badge(s)
Your next target is to reach 20000 upvotes.
You can view your badges on your board and compare yourself to others in the Ranking
If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word
STOPCheck out our last posts:
Congratulations @carolkean! You received a personal badge!
You can view your badges on your board and compare yourself to others in the Ranking
Check out our last posts: