The only case mutisig would make sense, if a trusted third party like the ones you mentioned could have the opportunity to verify various disbursements were received by Ignite prior to approving subsequent disbursements. Beyond that it would be pointless.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Hmm. How do you consider that could work? Why would Ignite approve the payment before receiving it?
The only way I see this working is if I powered up the monthly equivalent of the proposal and gave multisig on my account. For that amount for me to lock and give keys to id need prior compensation approved for my work.
I have some crypto money, I can risk 7k, but 24k is a bit too much to risk for $600 a month. 🙂
I wasn't trying to imply it could work, just stating that it was the only type of scenario where multisig would be useful.
I was hoping you had a solution. 😅
If this passes ill be willing to double my HP and do a multisig. If I get compensated for the work ill be willing to meet the 24k USD account value equivalent to the monthly proposal and lock it with multisig.
But as i said, all my info will be public, the law should be assurance enough.
I really do feel thats offering plenty from my side. Ill even sign whatever Brianoflondon writes up. I gave the community 200k HIVE back i had the keys of. I honestly feel this convo is superfluous.
Anyone have a good solution, im all ears.
Might be easier to delineate using a dedicated account, @hivemarketing for example! ;)