Yeah, i am agree and appreciate with you that before engaging in hive we never singed any where that are bound to maintain except few community joined. But the payout are maintained with few hive power holder and acting like god upon few minnows and others who can make passive income, anyway its very good analytical information upon a certain point.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
This is simply not true. Most of the posts on Hive do not get downvoted by anyone.
While we can't control the whales on what they upvote or don't, we can control our own output. We can provide quality content, that gets upvoted by people. If the quality does not match the potential rewards, there is always the possibility, that the post will get downvoted. We already know that before we post.
This is why we can't make demands on the system, or those who oversee it.
You can try to game it, but it will eventually be your own downfall when you get found out.
Yes, I understand, and I believe all the whales understand, that with great power, comes great responsibility. Part of that responsibility is to be fair.
Which act do you think is more unfair, A) letting undeserving posts get huge rewards, while deserving posts get nothing, or B) downvote those who weren't really deserving of those rewards, and returning that value back to the system so that others who actually do deserve it, might get the chance?
Yeah, its true that content and post should be relevant with payout and great power comes with a big responsibility.