What Part of “No” Don’t You Understand?

in #informationwar6 months ago (edited)

What Part of No Don't You Understand Graphic.png

When My daughter was quite young – maybe three – there was something She wanted, and for the life of Me, I cannot remember what, but the answer was “no,” and I explained to Her why.

She still fussed, whining and wheedling away.  I looked at Her and asked, “What part of “no” don’t You understand?”  A brief pause and She was in it again.  I said, “Look, You have learned that if You fuss enough Daddy and I will give in, right?  She nodded.

“Well,” I said, “when I ask, ‘What part of “no” don’t You understand,’ it means the answer is “no.”  Now, You have a choice here.  You can continue fussing and making it unpleasant for Those around You, or You can accept the answer and We can move on to something else.

A much longer pause.

“Okay, Mommy,” She said with a small smile, and started to talk of something else.

Over the many years since, I have thought of the lesson She so easily learned and ponder whether the psychopaths in control would be so quick to learn that grace.  They think They’re gentleOnes, but no gentleOne would choose unEthically.

It follows, therefore, that, given all the unEthical things They’re causing to happen (the ideas and money flow from Them), being brutes, They will not have the grace of a gentleOne.  This means, They will cause violence to be initiated.  GentleOnes do not initiate violence.

So when We gentleOnes first say “No” to Their legal/governmental system, working to build a foundation where We All are free and sovereign, living as richly as We choose, with three Laws of Ethics understood as the measure of behaviors, expect to defend that position.

As sovereigns, We can arm Our crowndom as We see fit to protect it.  And technically We have diplomatic immunity, standing as sovereigns and not “citizens” of any governmental structure (“sovereign citizen” is an oxymoron – either You are sovereign with none above You, or You are a citizen under some Other’s rule).  But don’t expect a gentleOnely recognition of diplomacy.

If We are to build a society of Ethical sovereigns, We would best prepare to defend both Ourselves and Others against bullies – whether They wear a costume or not.  In aggregate We will outnumber the bullies a million to one.

As sovereigns, We can choose whether to accept the lies of a crown bug invasion (a rebranding of the flu) and follow all the ritualistic things They are demanding, or We can refuse Their illogical mess.

As sovereigns, We may travel as We see fit, consume as We desire, do any Ethical thing We choose – anything that does not break the three Laws.  And those three Laws are not the rule of Others, but are natural Law expressed as the three things not to do:

1.  Do not willfully and without fully informed consent hurt or kill the flesh of anOther

2.  Do not willfully and without fully informed consent take or damage anything that does not belong to You alone

3.  Do not willfully defraud anOther (which can only happen without fully informed consent)

(Children cannot give fully informed consent, and so to do things like entice or force Them into sexual behavior is unEthical.)

In a society of Ethical sovereigns, every adult is responsible for what They create with Their behavior.  This is not to say that Ethical but rude behavior is responsible for how Others choose to feel about that behavior.  That is on the One choosing to feel the feelings.  But no longer will work be credited to “employers” or a lead on a project, when One has done the creation Oneself.

It is past time to withdraw Our consent from the psychopathic legal/governmental system, and to consent to a society of Ethical sovereigns – in fact, We can take membership in the Society Of Ethical Sovereigns (SOES).  To take membership, proclaim You are a member.  Unless You choose Your behavior unEthically, You are a member.  If You choose unEthical behavior, You are not a member, no matter how much You say You are.

Be prepared to ask, “What part of “no” don’t You understand?”

And consent to a vastly better foundation, helping to build it: https://odysee.com/@amaterasusolar:8/the-detailed-blueprint-vocal-redo:9

SOES Member Tag.png

Free energy:

Electrogravitics: Gravity Control & Energy from the Aether:

Take membership in the Society Of Ethical Sovereigns (SOES):

To All Who Seek To Better Our Planet

My Playlists:

Amaterasu Solar:

Amaterasu Solar Again:

https://odysee.com/@amaterasusolar:8 (Playlist to come when They create the function on Odysee.)



Endia – A Short Story by Amaterasu Solar

Quite the Opposite – A Short Story for Change – by Amaterasu Solar

The Abundance Paradigm – A Novella by Amaterasu Solar

My father taught Me never to believe anything.  He told Me to place probabilities and adjust them as new data come along, asking the question, "Does that explain what I see?," when evaluating data.  He was an aerospace engineer, and worked with T Townsend Brown (see My featured vid on YouTube).  From a very early age I was concerned that the way I was told things worked, in terms of government and social affairs, did not explain what I saw.  So the first few decades I worked to determine WHY this was.

I wound up in banking, seeing the flow of things in the headquarters of a major bank in Los Angeles.  I became intimately familiar with the flow of money, and economics.  I asked the question, "Why do We use money?"

When the web arrived, My research capabilities flourished, and I learned much that explained what I saw, but the only explanations I found for why We use money started with trade and barter, which are still money in a direct form, and did not answer the WHY.  Then, I came upon the explanation that these were used because, with a finite amount of stuff, it was to ensure that We got Our "fair share" in a scarcity environment, in exchange for the work We added.

From this I realized the WHY.  We were accounting for Our energy input into things.  And that We needed to do this because the Human energy was scarce compared to what We needed to be produced (back then).

I also discovered that over half Our planet's wealth was "owned" by fewer than 100 Humans...

I was very interested in psychology, too.  And studied it deeply, being fascinated by psychopathy, focusing on that aberration, learning that They had discovered a gene that manifested Individuals who were incapable of love, compassion, caring, and empathy for Others – primary psychopaths.  Seeing that the wealth was so disproportionate, and that the families who "owned" it inbred, what would explain what I saw would be that They wanted to retain that psychopathic gene.  Given that the wealth could feed, clothe, house ALL of Us (and give Us freedom) abundantly and many times over, and yet None set forth to care for Humanity, I had to give probability approaching 100% that They are psychopaths, as that explains perfectly what I see, and answers My quest for why the way I was told things worked did not explain what I saw.

And I asked...  If I was a psychopath, with enough wealth to buy anything and anyOne I wanted to, and given that money = power (power over Others is something psychopaths seek), would I be motivated to create a false "reality" for the masses and thereby manipulate Them?  I think You can figure out what answer I came up with.  And would that explain what I see?  Absolutely.

Now, given that money is merely the accounting token used to account for Our Human energy, it would follow that free energy would threaten fully the accounting for Our energy.  If I was a psychopath, with enough money to buy sites like Wikipedia, the media, the education system, etc., would I do all I could to suppress and hide free energy?

And given I personally know that electrogravitics offers both gravity control and energy from the aether (the electromagnetic field that pervades the universe), and that it went into black projects, such efforts to hide and suppress would explain what I see completely.

So I am neither a "conspiracy theorist," nor am I a "conspiritard," but rather...  I am a conspiracy analyst.  And given this analysis, knowing that conspiracies are the NORM in history and that they didn't just stop some years back, I conclude that conspiracies abound.  That explains perfectly what I see.

Love always.


Our governments are way out of line using this virus to take our sovereign rights away.. If government wants to help ..let them help protect those that ask for their help.. and leave the rest of us alone..

It was never about protection, and was all about profit and control.  Any "government" is a bad idea.  Haha!


Manually curated for #informationwar (by @truthforce)

  • Our purpose is to encourage posts discussing Information War, Propaganda, Disinformation, and Liberty. We are a peaceful and non-violent movement that sees information as being held back by corrupt forces in the private sector and government. Our Mission.
  • Discord, website, youtube channel links here.

Delegate to the @informationwar! project and get rewarded