Source
A Few Good Men
Thank you for joining me; before we continue I’d also like to take this opportunity to clarify that many aspects of this post are speculative and so I am framing it as a hypothesis. I am in no way shape or form sitting upon a lofty perch and thinking I have all the answers, indeed many of these questions are directed as much to myself as anyone else. If you like, this is an insight into my (occasional) inner dialogue around these issues and by virtue, they’re subject to change and refinement.
It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it. Aristotle
I am also speaking in very generalised terms and I'm certainly not denigrating the work of a multitude of brilliant researchers whom remain a thorn in the side of the manipulators, respect to you!! Some may experience a knee jerk reaction against some of these ideas (and they may well be right), but I feel that if our perspectives and confirmation biases preclude our ability to question and continually re-evaluate our beliefs, then we are neither free nor thinkers.
Are We The 20%?
So let’s first lay the foundations of this post. Within the old soviet model, it was widely acknowledged that with persuasion or propaganda you could manipulate the will of roughly 60% of the population. A further 20% would blindly follow any orders, and the remaining 20% would never capitulate. But how do you go about finding that elusive 20%? Equally, in this age of information warfare once you have found them how do you go about turning your would be enemies into one of your greatest assets?
Source
The Psychological Control Model
So let’s bring this concept into the modern era, equally lets acknowledge the insidious work that has been carried out by social engineers, propagandists, behavioural economists, military grade psychologists and individuals like Edward Bernays. Of course, anyone that has been paying close attention will realise that the control structure have a historically observed and highly sophisticated metric on the manipulation of collective psychology. Through every war, seismic event and (oft engineered) social change, our psychological reactions have been tracked, monitored and measured against success or failure. They have a very good understanding of how to infiltrate and direct our emotions and opinions.
Let’s consider the formative years of the internet. Much like the smoke and mirrors surrounding our happy clappy friends at Google, the creation of the internet (and I don’t doubt they were a component) is shrouded in tales of hippy activists that just wanted to connect the world, man! Equally, if you dig (pun intended) a little deeper you begin to reveal the Darpa and military industrial complex connections. Indeed, I did bring these most pertinent of truths into the modern era with this post, but I’ve digressed.
The Free Flow Of Information?
Certainly, the ramifications surrounding the advent of the internet would have been anticipated and our reactions to the free flow of information would have been prognosticated. It would have been known that many seminal (but relatively obscure) works in the arena of conspiracy and geo-politics would be brought to a wider sphere of public awareness. They must have anticipated that the free flow of information would evolve to shine a light upon their hearts of darkness.
Obviously, by creating a system whose ultimate intent was to ensnare us within their web of malfeasance, during the first phase the web would need to be marketed as a bastion of free expression, open source code, and an unregulated frontier of thought and ideas. Within the confines of a singular post this leaves me considering two possibilities; either they decided to weather the information storm and then (hopefully) close the door behind us, or fall back upon their decades (and then some) of social monitoring and psychological analysis and not only turn this outcome to their advantage, but in effect use it as a foundation from which to build their new world order. From a purely observational standpoint let’s consider the latter, let’s consider how the “truth” could be weaponised and (by acknowledging different social structures, brain archetypes and associated conformational bias) increasingly secularised.
Source
Predictive Programmers?
Within the truth community we are very much aware of the nature of predictive programming, seemingly not so many ponder the fact that many of us are predictive programmers per excellence. Slowly but surely we have woven our tales of horror and dystopian nightmares into pop culture and the public consciousness. For the most part, apart from becoming gradually aclimatised to our visions of the future, what have the general public done with this information? Nothing! Which leads me onto my next observation.
Source
Consent Manufacturers?
From my deep research (a great deal of which I have yet to share) the true hidden hand (the one several layers behind the deep state) are operating through dark occultic principles and laws. People may balk at such an idea but let’s think of it this way; you can be an atheist and still believe that Christians worship Christ. So within esoteric law the intent must always be signalled/known, from this perspective and in terms of the internet, the “truth” (albeit subjective and obscured) has been paraded in front of our faces for decades, in fact there is so much “truth” that we’re probably (intentionally) blinded by it! As such, through the wider societies (relative) inaction silence is taken as acquiescence.
In essence, have the truth movement been used to manufacture the consent of the wider populace? Given enough time can most opposing ideologies be used to their advantage? Indeed, without the anti-vaccination movement, could they manufacture the consent from the majority for the control of our bodies, what does such a precedent mean for our future? Certainly, here in 2019 many appear quite happy to allow such a dangerous intrusion. Because everyone knows, if you’re against vaccinations you must be thick, far (whoops alt) right or have ties to Russia, right?
I'm certainly not saying that people shouldn't resist draconian legislation; I am saying that until we find some form of widespread common unity, our resistance carries the potential that it can be used against us and the wider public. Indeed, whatever side of the fence you sit the legislated control of our bodies should be called out for the heinous invasion that it is. They require an antithesis to further their plans. What they fear is a complete rejection for they are powerless in the face of such opposition, that is why they keep us divided and the glare of public scrutiny focused upon the carefully perceptually collectivised opponents to their agenda. Once they label us and collectivise us they can use us to their advantage, don't allow them, defy categorisation. Weaponised identity politics is the name of the game, and a collective of self empowered individuals united in intent (not divided by details), is the key to the winning hand!
Free Speech?
Are the truth movement being used to manufacture the wider consent for the erosion of free speech? Let’s consider this possibility. When I first embarked upon my thirty year research odyssey a foundational core within this arena was the recognition of the left/right paradigm, in 2019 this foundation is crumbling. As the truth movement becomes increasingly equated with the right, they can now begin to blur the boundaries between alt and far right, and within the wider populace increasingly build upon equations with Donald Trump.
Once you have built a connection between an ideology and a singular individual, you can use them as a strawman and by virtue attach the same negative connotations to an entire movement. In fact they have framed every opposing argument to their NWO as far right ideologies, to a degree this has been successful, but it also hints at a potential large scale future event (or events) that they will use to tarnish and vilify all that oppose them.
Source
Now they have created a connection between Donald Trump, fascism, the far right and equated the alt with the far right, we have opposing ideologies cheering on big tech deplatforming and the erosion of free speech. Socially engineered (weaponised) identity politics has created a situation where people are entrenched in their manufactured vitriol and self perceived intellectual and moral high ground, that they lack the ability to self reflect upon the social dominos they have now set in motion. Indeed, without Donald Trump and the alt-far right equations could they justify the encroaching free speech restrictions? Certainly, without the omnipresent spectre of terrorism, they couldn't justify the spy grid! And so, as we’re gently nudged towards political extremes, we find that we’re increasingly trapped within a false dichotomy. And once again, I observe that such a dichotomy is indicative of the old Soviet control model.
The media and intelligence services appear to be carefully crafting a narrative that we’re under imminent attack from far right terrorists. Are there violent racist far right thugs out there? Yes for sure! Are they (like the media narrative that is being carefully cultivated) as organised and dangerous as ISIS? I would answer an emphatic no! I would also observe that they very much need a far right antithesis to their NWO. I also understand that the vast majority of people who identify as right wing do so not out of hate, but because they want to protect traditional values. Indeed, in a world where said values are under attack, of course certain demographics are going to gravitate towards the right, to the social engineer I would say this is an acknowledged outcome that can be capitalised upon.
Source
Thoughts From My Youth
At school I used to ponder why we were only taught about the methodology of the far right and not the far left, now I know. Through an infiltrated education system, the door was left ajar for the future weaponisation of the left/right mind control paradigm, and thus a final swing of the pendulum of totalitarianism. Indeed, if you’re crossing the road it’s best to look both ways! With a nod to 1984, by equating the truth with the far-right they can now portray truth as hate. They can also begin to play upon our visceral associations with the horrors of WW2, notice how opposing perspectives are suddenly fascist or Hitlarian. Watch how (through the elections) they ramp up the rhetoric and use it take further control of the internet. Are there fascists our there? Sure!! Equally, the mindset that has engineered the youth to see them hiding within innocuous sentences and micro-aggressions, is the most fascistic of them all!!
As an aside, I have previously acknowledged the socially engineered subconscious equation between hate preachers and hate speech. But let’s not forget that (once again) as a means of limiting free speech, hate speech prohibitions were originally advocated and endorsed by the former Soviet Union. Just to add; the reasoning behind the Soviet equations I’m making in relation to our current status quo, become more apparent by observing the connections I observed near the beginning of this post. I will also add that I highlight the soviet control model as a means of observing that they have an historically accurate pick and mix of psychological subversion techniques at their fingertips, I am not playing to the Russian hysteria.
Source
The Power To Change
Again, alluding to the esoteric nature of this control system, all truth is already known and (if you know where to look) within the public domain. Although we live in the age of illusion, at every step in our journey towards totalitarianism we’re given the opportunity to change our direction. With the internet, within our grasp we hold the collective sum of all human knowledge and the power to change our world and free ourselves from the shackles of control, yet (to a large degree) we waste these opportunities and ignore the encroaching technocratic fallacies, hence our liberator is now becoming our enslaver.
Within the crypto space (which is intended to morph into a one world digital currency) we hold the potential to emancipate the entirety of humanity, yet (again to a large degree) we use it as a tool to seek individual wealth. Indeed if there is a potential lucrative monetary gain, watch people betray their principles for facebook’s new Libra coin. See how they will begin to merge their technocratic hate speech (social engineering) laws, into their (centralised) monetary policy. Contemplate how such a system could morph into a total surveillance and thought control mechanism. And you know what? At the right price, people will probably be lining up to buy it! But what price do you put on freedom and free expression?
If through our greed, apathy and degeneracy we overlook and remain wilfully ignorant to the system that's being assembled around us, then within their interpretation of natural law we are both complicit with and the architects of our own prison. Indeed, our entire system has been created to manipulate our freewill and manufacture the consent of our fall from grace. In reality, this battle is as much within ourselves as it is within the wider sphere of existence. It is our internal inbalance that enables the world to become increasingly unbalanced.
Source
The Worldwide Awakening?
One thing I do believe, is that there is a worldwide awakening. Where I’m concerned is that I also believe it has been increasingly subverted, and that it is now leading us towards a manufactured false awakening. Are we witnessing a false start whose intent is to mask the shift of ages and welcome a change that we would have otherwise fought against? By observing history, surely they would understand the cyclical nature of renaissance? Why fight against it when you could lead and direct it? If you were clever and looking to create a one world control system, how would you play your final hand? Would you stand in the path of manipulated anger and vitriol, or as the voice of change, hope and salvation?
Source
The malfeasance of our political puppets may well be brought out of the darkness and into the light, heads may very well roll. But, and it’s a really big BUT we should also pay a keen interest on any laws that are invoked to elicit this seismic change, and how (within a future dictatorship) they might be used against us. This decrepit and morally bankrupt system may fall and crumble, but who is asking what comes next?
Again, when observing this through the lens of their belief system, through our own volition and freewill are apects of the truth movement being used to dismantle the old to make way for the new world order? Is there an element within all this that dictates we must be willing participants in the death of the old and the rise of the phoenix? I realise that statement is hypothetical and I could certainly be wrong, but it's an element I've pondered. Equally, from a purely observational standpoint, there certainly seems to be an element that is attempting to nuture and direct our anger towards the status quo.
Conclusion
The system grows in power because we give it our power, it lives because we breathe life into it. The more greedy, narcisistic and self absorbed we become the stronger it grows. I hear talk of revolutions, when in reality that simply plays to the agenda and provides the final antithesis for the intended total control system. We don't need a revolution, we need an evolution of thought, consciousness and understanding.
In reality, I've come to believe that (depending upon your perspective) this is a spiritual/philosophical battle for the soul of humanity. I don't believe (although I respect others will think differently) the answers to our current situation reside in a political solution, indeed if we create a new system with the same mindset we're building a house of cards. The answers lay within each of us, they reside in how we view and interact with the world and each other. It's within our potential to build a paradise on earth, we can have it all but we can't have it all to ourselves. Will we change our course, or revert to type? As always the decision is ours to make.
Thank you for joining me, until next time I will leave you to ponder who has the perceptualflaws. If you appreciate my work I would be humbled to receive an upvote and or resteem
Written by perceptualflaws
Gifs from giphy.com
Banner gifs courtesy of @justcallmemyth
I’ve got to say I read this several hours ago and my subconscious has been working on it since. I think I know what you’re conveying. The level of planning and gamesmanship involved in manipulating the behavior of the populace is very sophisticated and will generally work on some of the people some of the time if not the 60% the Soviet model claims.
However, I would posit the Soviet model’s numbers are from a bygone era and probably before the information age began to bear fruit as it did in the late ’80s, to mid-’90s, perhaps the information age is the lit fuse that brought about the eventual downfall of the Soviet Union. At its peak, the Soviets had absolute control over the free flow of information in Russia. Now the various nation-states are trying their damndest to reboot or regain the type of power they had back in the day.
Russia is banning religions similar to China, yet they haven’t gone so far as to impose a social credit system. The PRC has the people of Hong Kong up in arms (metaphorically speaking) because they don’t want to live in the high tech dystopia the mainland just rolled out, and that’s not to ignore the low tech horrors that have been going on for ages now.
In America, the U.S. continues to test its limits on multiple fronts. In New York, people in the corporate world are coerced into adopting one of the many hundred-odd gender pronouns for each individual, or else pay staggeringly unrealistic fines. Many of the several states are facing an ever-increasing test on the right to bear arms and their various accessories such as bump stocks, high capacity magazines, and silencers. Additionally, there is a war on those who would choose not to take vaccinations. It’s slow going, insidious, but always marching forward.
Ultimately, I don’t think we should discount the power of the people to shed sunlight, the great disinfectant, upon all corners of tyranny throughout the globe, this will happen naturally with the communication power the internet has provided us. I foresee the war on ideas will continue on for decades, and the people will equally resist it. As the government’s crackdown, it will only make the problem worse for them as necessity is the mother of invention and the people will be forced to improvise.
I think the struggle between liberty and tyranny will go on forever, as it has since the beginning of time. Despite the propaganda, there are no clear winners or losers. The way I see it, both Orwell and Huxley are being proven right every day. It’s not just them either; many other futurists are right as well. Essentially, those things we focus on the most become reality constructs in our mind. That’s not to say there is no objective truth to be had. Everyone is running around divining their own truths and building unique reality tunnels.
The mainstream corporate news and entertainment industry plays a big role in keeping a majority of people grounded into a reality that is projected for us, similar to Plato’s cave. However, one could just as easily veer off the beaten path by picking up a book, writing a story, or predicting alternate futures that or more palatable than Orwell and Huxley’s visions. If we live these future outcomes in the present day, even in small ways, it will carve a path in that direction.
I guess what I’m saying is that resistance is not futile, and we should have faith in the power of our individual and collective spirit or willpower. In this world, it seems like everything is intended to drain our life force, but with a little shift in focus and belief in ourselves we can make great changes to not only the terrain but also the internal landscape of others. The ability to communicate; that alone, is an immense superpower we all have.
You are certainly doing it justice, and I hope more will follow your example. Have you ever put any thought into writing inspirational works of fiction that might convey to people how to live with a spirit of authenticity, or resist tyranny in clever ways? It seems like the best works of fiction I’ve enjoyed have always been people who resist unthinkable levels of tyranny and prevail.
Or maybe the A team needs something equivalent to the B team’s rules for radicals. Maybe we need a rule’s for fill in the blank, a handbook that outlines how we can carve a path to winning peacefully with effective persuasion. Or can you recommend any works on these topics that I may be unaware of? Thanks for reading this ridiculously long comment—I’m just spitballing over here.
Hey my friend,
Hope you've been well?! Thanks for leaving such a brilliant and well composed/considered comment, and sorry for the late eyes on it but it's been a long day at work and I've only just sat down. Yes I do very much agree with your analysis of the Soviet era .. indeed, one thing is for sure (although many remain willfully ignorant) and that's the populace are much better informed in this modern era, hence the subversion techniques are far more insidious and sophisticated. When I allude to the Soviet control model I'm hinting at a similar methodology, but different methods. With the elites influences within wars and the communist links etc I highlighted in my green phoenix post, they kind of have a pick and mix of psychological subversion techniques at their fingertips and (much like Huxley's Brave New World) appear to be creating more of a prison for the mind .. one where (those that have been handed the moral high ground) refuse to acknowledge what is happening, and in essence police the jail that is being created for us. They begin to enjoy their enslavement because they think of themselves as our guards and the guardians of morality, hence welcome the thought police and free speech controls .. anything to silence the voices of those that speak against those that have assumed an inverted moral high ground, it's very scientific and it's specifically being targeted at the youth .. and because I monitor social trends, that is the chief area of my concern.
With regards to the Chinese social credit system, and like I alluded to in the post, I can certainly muse upon how through something like a facebook crypto (or something similar) they could merge a social control system into their monetary policy, with all the de-platforming and an ever-increasing array of hate speech definitions, we can see them setting the precedent .. pushing the boundaries. They are slowly gathering pace, ramping up the momentum and turning up the heat. In terms of Saul Alinsky's rules for radicals .. they appear to be operating from that playbook. But you're right .. a mirror image of that would be a fantastic idea and some real food for thought, thank you!! I haven't written any fiction works .. but I do have some ideas I've been mulling over, it's just that I have a couple of other books planned first. I might first try and write a book that I feel may be more commercially successful, which (if it went well) would take a bit of the work burden of me and then I could get into something much deeper and more profound, we shall see. Resistance definitely isn't futile and I apologise if I didn't make myself clearer in that respect, what I was kind of trying to say is that within the truth movement we often allow ourselves to be divided by details .. when being united by a good intent is a far more powerful force. Thanks again @thoughts-in-time :)
Thanks for this thought provoking read.
Posted using Partiko Android
No problem @j85063 Thanks for taking the time to read. :)
After reading a few of your posts in one sitting, I have much to say that I believe you seem open-minded enough to entertain. I am leaving this comment only to remind myself to do so tomorrow or whenever I am next on the internet, as I have to go now. But, I appreciate your mind and believe that a conversation could prove very fruitful for us both in ascertaining the most likely future, and how best to address it.
Thank you @lordless.exile .. I'm open-minded to many ideas, opinions and perspectives, and can entertain/consider several at any given time. I'll be on and off here over the next week or so. :)
I really don't know where to begin, as you have said a lot. This comment may be very disorganised, but I will try to share all of my relevant thoughts.
To begin, as far as the 20% who will never capitulate - I think this has been replaced, thanks to modern media and advanced subliminal programming (probably written by machine learning algorithms at this point), by a 20% who believe they are working against the agendas of the architects of society - buy who are in fact doing their bidding.
There's a lot of "anarchists" and anti-government peoples out there nowadays, and I think the majority believe they have come to this mindset through a heightened ability to discern truth - but from what I can see, the anti-establishment sentiment has been getting propagated by the establishment itself, for at least a decade, but more increasingly as of late. I actually just found out two days ago, that my 12 year old niece is now learning about conspiracies in school, in a class called RME - religious and moral education. Based on how she described the class to me, it seems to be yet another mechanism leading people towards a strong distrust for government.
As a side note, I wonder how relevant school will continue to be. If you are familiar with how public schooling was modelled - after the old Prussian model, because their soldiers did not run away in war and were willing to die for their country, then it seems the main purposes of public education in the West has been - 1) to cultivate a sentiment of patriotism in children, and a willingness to go off to war and die for their countries 2) to prepare them for a life of working 9-5 3) to create a sense of social competition which will later become the fuel which drives the consumerism. However, they have things like fortnite to tease children into the idea of being soldiers now, the sense of competition is being worked into the mind by the gamifcation of every app and website, and there's little need to be preparing people for a life of working 9-5 when in a decade the robots will be handling most of the jobs and humans will likely be earning money through "making contributions to society" and streaming/content creating etc. In short, moving from the age of payments into the age of rewards, the age of work into the age of dancing monkeys in a giant circus, for me, almost completely defeats the necessity for public schooling. I think that soon children will be raised on YouTube and media, which also seems to be fitting for another reason - because as the divide and conquer strategy gets further and further, we now find that school is where people make friends and now they seem to want less of that - they want our friends to exist online and not in our local communities.
It is also my thoughts that the architects of modern society and those seeking to shape the world of tomorrow are magicians, versed in the occult arts. I am not so sure I agree with there being a rule that they have to be forthcoming about anything - but if they want to use our own power to have us create the world they want then they have to insert ideas and concepts into our minds. But, I think with most things - there are levels of involvement. For example, if we take 9/11. If we are going to say that was a conspiracy, and that there were "bad guys" involved. Well, I would think that some of those perpetrators would be under the impression it was about money and cultivating an excuse to go to war. Others would be privy to another reason, that it was about justifying more invasive rules of governance in the US. While fewer still, but some, would understand it to be a ceremonial magick ritual and human sacrifice - I have a couple of different theories on the purpose of that ritual, and wonder again if it could have been serving both but different levels knew different information - which means more disparate intentions and more goals achieved.
I say all that because when we think of those working against us, we often think of them as all organised and operating with an agreed agenda but I doubt that's likely. I think that of all the people working against us - ourselves included - that everyone has been carefully led into a tunnel where they can see little but their own part and are unable to understand that there are multiple tunnels running parallel to them forging a great structure of the society tomorrow, but all with different ideas of what that tomorrow is going to look like. Only those at the very top of the agenda will have a clear picture of what is actually being created, and my guess is that there are very, very few of those.
Who is behind it? Hmm. I read in a different one of your posts your thoughts on the NWO and the rising Phoenix. I think that it's possible that the Phoenix is a metaphor for the Ancient Phoenician empire. Birds are often used to symbolise empires and the lifespan of a Phoenix is akin to the average length of an empire. I think it is a metaphor for how the same small group of people have retained power over the world, by establishing empires and then eventually pulling the plug and having the empire brought down by the people after a rebellion, but then guiding the rebirth of governance covertly towards the establishment of a new, stronger, more invasive and powerful empire under a new name. But, I do wonder if there will ever be a need to pull the plug again after this time, for once they have blockchain - which I believe is not to do with currency as much as it is to do with the conception of a new internet and surveillance network capable of recording everything, everywhere, at all times.
So I think you are right that we need to keep an eye on what's going on around us, and people have been led to worship bitcoin and blockchain so much that I was quite surprised to even read that you were skeptical about it where it could lead. People are getting emotionally invested in defending the blockchain now. But, this coming age of Aquarius will, I believe, bring us a new timeline. Those who say the end of time is upon us, I believe are correct. But, the end of time just means we start again at Year 1, with a new God to worship - perhaps technology, or ourselves.
So, to get onto my more out there theory, but one I see so much evidence for and am writing about myself now - I think that the fall has to happen before we can get to a one world government model. A lot of people think that there is a huge depopulation event coming, and that the government or war will be the main cause of death. But, I wonder if it will not sooner be ourselves who kill one another. When our hatred for centralised power has been piqued, we will perhaps be led to tear down our Western governments and, for a time, be forced to govern ourselves. I think the ultimate goal will be a one-world-g0vernment, but the only way we will ever be willing to accept that, or the chip that will likely come with it, is if we first were shown how much government is needed because we cannot look after ourselves. So, I fear a purge like period of anarcho-capitalism, where corporations have been let off the leash, and where with no centralised police, the people deal out their own justice as vigilantes. The internet/worldwide web, is definitely nefarious in nature. But, given the words net and web, which both allude to a sense of capture, I think it has been more about amassing information on people and getting an insight into how humans think and behave, than anything else. And, we have seen information be used a lot in the last year to breed hatred and anger towards people. It would surprise me not if in the future, the stupidest things we have said on the internet come back to haunt us when angry mobs get their eyes on it after "a hacker releases our sensitive data"
This is getting really long.. and I don't even remember what I have written. Lol. But, I do fear that any depopulation that occurs will largely be us murdering each other, or dying in poverty after the financial crash that will lead to the blockchain tokenised society.
But it's like you say. We change the future by changing how we think. It's really simple, in fact, at least in theory. All we have to do to fix everything - is to make people understand that we're on the same team, and not adversaries. I suspect though, that modern language as we know it - which is largely accredited to the Ancient Phoenicians interestingly, is working against that possibility unbeknownst to us.
Hey @lordles.exile .. thank you for the great comment and sorry for the late reply! I run a business centred around the hospitality industry and with all the beautiful weather we've been having it's been non-stop nose to the grindstone.
Yes I very much agree, in fact within a recent post I made a similar statement about the left, where I observed that the leftwing old enemy of globalism has been (unknowingly) relegated to the choirboys of the globalist agenda, so yes I very much agree that through methods of algorithmically nudged psychological subversion techniques and identity politics, they have been able to turn their enemies into their greatest assets .. I did write a fairly long post about how this process plays out through social media and have attached it below.
I very much agree (as per my post) that much of the anti-establishment rhetoric is being whipped up by the establishment themselves, they want us to (of our own free will and volition) destroy the old to make way for the new world order, they also want us to ostracise all that stand in their way .. indeed "hate" is now a socially engineered weaponised word, as is inclusivity .. as it's only inclusive to those that are aligned with a perceptual hive mind and ever-narrowing band of acceptable opinion. As far as I can see the true evil in this world is hiding behind an increasingly inverted perception of virtue .. indeed the social media phenomenon of "virtue signalling" is (to my mind) a socially engineered construct.
In terms of education, I think we will begin to observe a move towards some kind of global "common core" .. indeed this has long been the mantra of UNESCO, and UNESCO have partnered with Bill Gates & Microsoft (Gates was previously a choirboy for common core). Equally, UNESCO is obviously an instrument of the UN & the Rockefeller family (who are the architects of the UN) have also (for many decades) increasingly infiltrated the classroom .. as have Google, all globalist institutions looking to create a world citizen and a technocratic feudal society (us and them). Obviously, if you want a feudal society at some point you will need a global education system that's aligned on an ever-increasing array of commonalities .. i.e the hive mind of accepted opinion. It's all very insidious and scientific .. and like all dictatorships, it's going straight for the children.
I agree with your statement relating to them being magicians, equally my observation relating to them signalling their intent is an aspect of esoteric law. It's my belief (and I have much information that I have yet to share) that the bloodlines in control of this world have been consolidating power for literally thousands of years, the library of Alexandria was pillaged before it was burnt and that these people hold a vast array of occultic information around the psychology and physiology of the homo-sapian .. the reason they signal their intent is because they are attempting to work within a warped understanding of natural law, they believe that by doing this they negate judgement. They have been doing this for thousands of years, and if you know where to look the signs are all around us.
There was an ancient religion that elevated themselves through seven virtues that they believed took them closer to divinity, this belief system is a complete inversion of that statement .. and if you look around you can see we're increasingly being nudged towards an inverted state of being .. but again we must arrive at this state through the manipulation of our freewill .. we must do this to ourselves and each other.
Yes I couldn't agree more .. in fact my last three major posts have all alluded to the validity of that statement, I tend to think of people (even if they believe they're all powerful) as compartmentalised aspects of a broader intent, very few will know the true nature of that intent and mostly people are controlled and directed through their greed and lust for power,equally there will be people with a very good intent that are being (unknowingly used within the same agenda) .. I recently wrote; "This is the new form of governance, and it doesn’t require vast arrays of individuals all working towards a nefarious intent, indeed it hides behind virtue and a good intent. Through scientific methods of compartmentalisation and psychological indoctrination; a relative handful can draw vast resources and tenuously aligned movements to create a powerful and alluring narrative."
I also feel that much of the purge will be carried out by ourselves .. in many ways you can already see the division lines being drawn. Algorithms and social media carefully dividing people into categories and fanning the flames of hatred .. as you allude to, I can also envisage an era of chaos that will eventually have people on their knees begging for a one world government .. begging for a control system that a few years previously they would have fought against. That said, I really wouldn't rule out the possibility of some form of world war to bring about the aforementioned state of chaos and murderous rampage. In terms of our words coming back to haunt us .. that is something I very much agree with, hence why I attempt to choose them very carefully. lol
Yes, Phoenicians who became the Venetians, and as far as I'm aware (this is from memory so I'll have to check) but the English language is an inversion of ancient Hebrew. Phoenicians, Phonetics, the clues are certainly in the words and alas the words are becoming increasingly weaponised to create a socially engineered perceptual reality, altering the use of words but still retaining the subconscious essence of what they once meant .. I'm keeping an eye on many of them. There is a lot going on here .. hence I don't allow my belief, to impede my understanding/learning! Thanks again for the great comment my friend!
https://steemit.com/conspiracy/@perceptualflaws/the-psychology-of-control-social-media-and-the-frontlines-of-the-reality-war
Another truly excellent post my friend! I think the system is certainly on the precipice of change, but what change that is we will find out. The winds are in their sails but they, like mother nature, are unpredictable and can turn on a dime in favor of things they do not anticipate.
Off to read the other one of yours in my queue while I eat, cheers!
@swayzilla this is another guy I love to read, though his posts are more spiritual, esoteric and thought provoking than any of the other things I've shared with you.
Hey @cmplxty .. thanks for taking the time to read/comment and sorry for the late reply but I've been ill! I think there is a strong possibility that the change we see unfolding around us, is akin to a false start and that rather than charging through the front door, the NWO is attempting to sneak in through the kitchen window. Equally, part of this psyop relates to the impression that they're all powerful and that we're powerless .. if that were true, they wouldn't need to spend billions on propaganda and social engineering, hence like you say .. things very much can turn on a dime!
Thanks I've not heard of him before, but I will look into his work .. I'm saving a lot of my spiritual/esoteric ideas back for my book, hence why I've been writing more within this genre. If you've yet to read it the post below is well worth a read and its the sequel to the one world religion post that I think you've read. At the bottom of this post is a link to the last part of the chapter, then at the bottom of that is a link to the short conclusion. Thanks again my friend!
https://steemit.com/conspiracy/@perceptualflaws/bloodlines-of-the-serpent-gods-chapter-3-a-green-phoenix-rising-building-the-one-world-disorder
Haha sorry I should have been a bit more specific in my comment, swayzilla is a great personal friend of mine, I was referring him to your blog for him to read.
I heard you were ill! Stomach bugs are the worst. I recently started taking activated charcoal when I feel those types of things coming on and knock on wood so far it’s done amazing at preventing it! The charcoal absorbs the bacteria, it’s a staple in our cabinet now!
Posted using Partiko iOS
Ah no worries dude and thanks again! Great shout on the charcoal .. I'm all in with natural remedies, in fact I've just brought a book on medicinal & edible wild plants in the British Isles .. great to see the old knowledge is coming back! Equally, painful to see that in retaliation google have weaponised their search engine algorithms to paint a bad picture of organic food and natural medicine! Keep spreading the knowledge my friend. :)
Curated for #informationwar (by @thoughts-in-time)
Ways you can help the @informationwar!
I have come to believe this as well. Indeed, in my understanding, politics are irrelevant, and obsolete. I should clarify that I do have a political point of view, and reckon everyone does, but that regardless of those views, matters beyond our individual preferences, beyond politics, are effecting changes in the way power is wielded.
Decentralization is ongoing. As technology advances it is becoming able to be deployed by individuals to an ever greater degree. Particularly AI is delivering the power of institutions to individuals, and AI moderates all other technologies in an alarming way. Excel, the software, is a form of AI that delivers the power of a team of accountants to it's users. One person, using Excel, can do analysis that only a few years ago would have required a fleet of analysts. Excel (I am using it as a symbol of similar AI tech) is continuing to improve, and as it does, and means of interfacing with AI, along with the power of computers, advances, a breaking point is being reached. This ability to analyze and calculate is becoming so technical that it is necessarily being simplified to the point that the interface is disappearing.
I set up my first network in 1987, before Windows existed, before DOS was even commonly available. As networks became more complex the use of the software became more difficult, and as more devices and interfacing mechanisms were introduced, controlling networks was increased in complexity. However the GUI changed that, and networks became very simple, relatively speaking, for the end users to work in. The commands necessary to send a file to Bob over the network were mostly automated, and Alice didn't need to know how to format and write the command lines that executed the transfer herself. She only needed to use a shorthand, and the GUI did the rest.
As the complete individual control of software was rendered obsolete, more of the inner workings of software became obscure and ineffable. Along with this came virii and malware, hiding in those dark corners of programs we didn't need to precisely control anymore. Today you need to know almost nothing about network topology to use a smartphone to text your mom, and the operating systems themselves are malware, sort of dualities magically undertaking to make your communications facile, yet eliminating your privacy and security by spying on you for the overlords profiting from your use of their products.
But networks continue to evolve, and evolutionary forces necessarily determine how they do. As Bob and Alice are harmed by overlords spying on them, they increasingly seek to secure their communications to protect themselves, and that institutional power that has marked production, being the source of harm, is becoming obsolete as a result. Mesh networks, encrypted communications, and open source hard and soft ware are becoming the cutting edge of technological advance as individuals seek to survive and prosper. To prosper they need to control the tech they use to prevent malice from being part of it, and decentralization across all fields is beginning to eliminate overlords that are the societal malware causing harm.
Looking forward and applying what we have observed, it seems likely that soon we will be printing our own phones, and choosing our software from open source free libraries, while creating the communications network as an ad hoc system where each of us is both a node and the means to pass communications to surrounding nodes, rendering institutional instrusion and parasitism obsolete. Clearly this is not the intention of those overlords who are the beneficiaries of institutional power, but the harm they cause individuals by parasitizing them is naturally avoided and defenses evolve against that harm necessarily. Since it is the vector of institutional power that is the source of that harm, it is institutional power and parasitism that is becoming obsolete as development advances. These forces operate at a sub-societal level. They are primal forces, not societal, or institutionally determined - not politics, and not impacted by politics.
Using decentralized communications secure from parasitism is necessary for communists and capitalists, overlords and serfs alike. Institutions are becoming obsolete, as technology advances individual means of production across every field of industry. Institutional power is necessarily centralized and parasitic, and these limits are surmounted by physics, something institutions and political power cannot either command or ban. This evolution is a natural force, waves smashing on a beach, that only allows barnacles to survive in certain zones, and nothing else.
If we want to use the beach, we simply are mindful of the surf. We don't prevent waves and tides, we wait for low tide to use the lower beach, and stay higher when the tide is high. Our political bent doesn't change that at all. Capitalists and Communists alike use the beach the same way. This limits the siting of harbors, and restricts our launching of boats off the beach to certain kinds of boats in particular ways, and to certain times.
Similarly, society rides on the waves of technological development, and as individual means of production, mesh networks, and open source free software continue to develop, the erosion of institutional power is as natural and inevitable as the erosion of the bedrock of the beach, and just as sand is produced by tide and storm, so is a society of individuals empowered to associate freely by technology. Our politics can only ride the landscape, and thus decentralization renders politics obsolete in the end, as institutional power to project force cannot compel obedience in a decentralized landscape.
Barnacles cannot live on the sand, but must stick to rocks. Only those societies possible to impose on the shifting sand of decentralized industrial power are potential going forward, and our political desires are immaterial to this. Further, as transportation advances, eventually space travel will become available to individuals at their sole option. In the infinite universe, no collectivism imposed by overlords is possible.
We will be free, and the stars like sand in our toes.
Hey my friend,
Thank you for taking the time to leave such a brilliant reply and apologies for the delay in getting back to you, but I haven't had five minutes to myself. Yes I do very much agree with your perspective, I envisage it as a race to a dystopian or utopian finish line .. equally the tighter they try to hold onto power the more they become the driving force behind our creativity and ingenuity. I know that within our grasp we hold the keys to a very bright future, my perspective is that to achieve our full potential is going to require as much inner work as out is in the outer design and implementation. In essence a paradigm shift in how we view the world, each other, our definitions of success and certainly our manipulated and inverted perceptions of power.
Although I feel we're profoundly interconnected with one another, I don't really get into the whole "we are one" perspective as (through studying youth social trends) I feel the concept has the potential to become weaponised and nudge us towards the collectivisation of thought, action and behaviour. But a world of self-empowered individuals united in good intent and working towards the emancipation of humanity, well that is a dream whose first tentative steps will one day become mighty strides.
Like you highlight, decentralisation is absolutely key, in every sphere of society .. indeed (as I've recently written about) in terms of energy, it's a greenwashed centralised energy policy that is a key driver for the much of the environmental degradation we see unfolding around us, dam the rivers, build industrial size windfarms on precious landscapes, chop down vast swathes of ancient forest so we can burn it in our bio-refineries and call it green energy .. keep energy centralised and heavily subsidised. Or how about decentralising the whole industry and (quite literally) give power to the people?!
There is the tech for every house to more than meet it's energy needs, instead of handing away our tax money to fund industrial-scale energy projects .. give it back to us! Enshrine it into law that every new build must produce not only it's own energy needs but also allow us to trade the excess on the markets, or feed an emergency or industrial skeleton grid, or go towards social enterprises etc etc. This is just one example and like you allude to, decentralisation in every sphere of society is absolutely key to our freedom and survival. There is both the thirst and the ingenuity out there, alas it'd being strangled by a noose of redtape .. we need to break free of the perceptual prisons that have been assembled around us, become united in intent and not allow ourselves to continually divided by petty details and generationally alternating facts.
I know it doesn't always come across in my writing, but long term I am filled with optimism and hope for the future of our species .. I just feel that it's going to be difficult rights of passage before we realise our full potential. I'm trying to tread a fine line between informing people of the bigger picture, inspiring thought and questions, making them aware of the seriousness of our situation .. but not in such a way that they feel powerless to rise to this most important of occasions. That's the intent, the reader can decide the reality of that statement. :) Thanks again for the inspiring comment @valued-customer
It has been determined that you are trash, therefore, you have received a negative vote.
PLEASE NOTE: If you engage with the trash above you also risk receiving a negative vote on your comment.