Well this should put to bed the idea that the initial mask guidance was a noble lie.
I would love if the whole "noble lie" explanation for public policy was generally discarded. It is far overused, especially by people skeptical of government bureaucrats. It almost never is a correct assessment of a policy action.
Most of the time what is going on is:
- a genuine gap in scientific knowledge
- an actual error in scientific reasoning
- a bad standard of evidence for policy in a crisis
(2) is generally minimized by the conservative, consensus-driven behavior of the experts in the government agencies, but at the cost of speed and 3).
The mask guidance error was a mix of 1) and 3).
- we had very limited evidence for broad-based cloth mask wearing and we had never had a respiratory virus that had significant asymptomatic transmission
- standards of evidence came into conflict with making decisions under uncertainty. Advocating cloth masks was close to a zero-cost intervention that at worst would have been mostly useless. Ideally we minimize 3) by effective policy leadership that can make the necessary calls amidst uncertainty.
Your content has been voted as a part of Encouragement program. Keep up the good work!
Use Ecency daily to boost your growth on platform!
Support Ecency
Vote for Proposal
Delegate HP and earn more