So the concept isn't based on the front end, but then it is? Either the concept ISN'T based on SteemIt Inc or it is. Ned has ceded that it isn't, you claim that because it can be controlled and because of Steemit "limits" the "process" (both of which are exaggerations and not small or little at all) that it is, and somehow you think that steemit can ever be run like Steem. If I make a website like busy that phrases the data, and I "limit" the phrasing to only what I like, by your logic it limits and invalidates in a way the very notion of Decentralization through the Witnesses. As long as the witnesses AREN'T censoring the network everything is fine, regardless of what the possibilities are, all else is FUD.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
I don't really understand how you manage to, in every comment you make, twist what I have said into something I haven't said and to be frank, as you have done in every interaction we have had, I feel like you are trolling me.
For the sake of completeness:
You have not been specific when you stated the phrase 'the concept' - so I am not 100% clear what you are referring to. The front end of steemit.com is the primary interface to the steem blockchain currently (in terms of numbers of users). The witness voting page is the only place in steemit.com to make witness votes. Therefore, the witness voting page is the primary interface used to log witness votes.
Steem actions and logs the votes, while Steemit.com is the primary portal for their input.
I do not know what you are referring to there.
Not exaggerations, but provable fact. The only question is whether or not the limitation is deliberate or not.
I have no idea what this means.
I am specifically referring to the witness voting process only, with regards decentralisation. I think you are missing the point.
I am muting you now as I feel our interactions are a waste of my time.