“[I]n the journey to comprehending the Incomprehensible Personal God, we are actually the recipients of an all encompassing INVITATION to know God. We are gifted by this invitation by this self-same God. God wants to be known.”
I want to be certain that you know what I am about to say is absolutely genuine and has no relation to either attempting to get upvotes or to be unnecessarily flattering.
I believe that the part of your response that I quoted in this comment, is one of the most beautiful expressions of the relationship between Man and Providence that I have ever encountered.
I truly mean it, to the point where I thought you were quoting Barth, when, to the best of my knowledge, notwithstanding it’s derivation from ideas of other theologians, these are your own unique words.
I’m somewhat enamored with the Song of Songs, because the whole concept of situating the Agapic Love between Man and the Divine within the context of the powerful Eros (in the classical sense of the concept) found throughout Solomon’s Song, is such a powerful way of conveying the inconceivable magnitude at which the Present Deity’s love for humanity and each human exists.
So when you say that this Divine Invitation is an invitation to an intimate conversation like as between two lovers, my heart and my head go straight to Canticles, and it makes it very obvious why such an arguably “out-of-place Love Poem” in a debatably “minor” part of Scripture, has had both a broad and deep influence on so many aspects of the theologies of the Abrahamic Faiths.
Put more simply, I’m fairly certain you have summed up the most important underlying strand woven into every part of our understanding (such as it is) of our position within the Mind of of God Himself. (Or, if that’s too mystical, I can replace “the Mind of God” with “Existence permeated by God’s Essence.”
I’m delighted (and I don’t use the word “delighted”) to know that there is someone in then world who has the incredible ability to convey the types of thoughts that I’m certain all people of Faith feel but can’t quite translate into language.
It's a delight to find someone else who is enthusiastic about the Song of Songs. One book that says so much about God without ever mentioning God. I think maybe I'll go read it again.
I read a great quote yesterday (after I started to re-read Song of Songs and various analyses of it):
The quote essentially says that it’s subtle metaphors accomplish massive tone-shifts “between the gaiety of bliss and the despondency of infidelity.” For the example, “it leaps seamlessly from the ecstasy of [Passover] night to the crisis of faith six days later on the banks of the Reed Sea.”
And it does all of this with only hints as to its larger metaphorical meaning—making the revelation of its deeper meaning after a repetition of reading that much more mind-blowing.
Remove all the metaphorical connotations, and even just on the surface, as a pure love poem, it still ranks up there as one of the greats.
With the multiple layers of metaphor and deeper meaning...it’s realky a no brained why it’s called the Song of Songs.