IF it turns out to be a great idea, it may land up being something witnesses want to integrate upstream in the future. But I feel just like email, this is going to have to be a protocol built on top. Like DKIM, SPF and DMARC combined with blacklists, we will have to build lists initially until the protocols either are changed OR the systems (condensor) built on top support them.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
I agree with a protocol, which is why I asked where the honeypot would be integrated. But it should be between submission to and the ledger. So on witness, on blockchain, level.
Which means a HF.
Otherwise I fear that this is a very well-meant initiative but the conversion (statistical chance of positives) is too low. And of course the MO is defeat automated comments by means of an automated comment/message but that shouldn’t necessarily be mutually exclusive.
But as said, I’m going to keep an eye on this because I’m very curious about this.
Yes see my comment about @bigdeej's discovery for how we can store CUSTOM_JSON for ANYTHING we want on the blockchain without any change to witness code: https://steemd.com/tx/ca52211257da3f47980e38dc50246fe174eb196f
Yes, yes. Slow down already so people get time to both read your comments and think about the practicality of things. geez
Sorry 2 people control this account for replying =D will do!