Sort:  

It is a shame that a few fanatics of political correctness can determine which information can be disseminated. Berniesanders creates nothing of value; he is nothing but a marauder that bullies those with limited resources. Steemit platform is controlled by those that can cause the most disruption, not by those who can create the most value. Such is the consequence of a system that lacks any guiding hand, or leadership.

I don't understand how people see censorship as a useful tool...for anything.

So weit ich weiß gibt's noch eine Seite auf der man ALLE Beiträge von STEEMIT lesen kann also auch die geflagten!!!
Was auf der blockchain steht wird nie zensiert! Es ist nur nicht mehr auf STEEMIT sichtbar. Aber immer noch auf der anderen App!

Posted using Partiko Android

Steem is what it is, being fake wont help, but what can ya do?

Come on over to Minds, they dont pay as well, but they got just as much chance of mooning.

how's minds goin'?
...when you say not pay as well...how little are we talking? lol

I've been there since Jun 15, and have ~650k coins worth .15usd each in eth, but I got a bug bounty when they took away my billions of points.

They sandbagged my views because of my content, but as they are nwo controlled, they are just following orders.
They've stopped answering my bug questions, too.

You just have to try for yourself, everybody's experience is different.
Poke 'em in the eye.

So these downvotes accumulate to about roughly 2,10$ on the post and 0,18$ for comments.

You are absolutely certain to leave this platform anyway?

Otherwise it of course could be possible to go into the fight against a person who simply stated he wishes to mob you off this platform. No further reason stated.
Of course your content is not entirely non-controversial but he didn't even give a reason, e.g. antisemitism.

The question is important to me. Burning fingers for someone who doesn't even wish to stay here is not my take. Then I rather would archive this as a case for the future how arbitrarily some people wish to decide to mob other people off of steemit.
Page is bookmarked. I'll read it rather rarely (to never) though.

I use steempeak bytheway. There, of course, I see everything of your posts. Article and comments themselves and also preview. You'd need to get below 0 reputation to become hidden.

d

but I did anyway because you wrote a good comment and I will always reply to good comments as long as I am on Steem.

Have a nice day.

Thanks, you to.

I didn't speak of winning, I did speak of going into a fight.
Besides from winning/losing there are other (side-)effects a fight could have, like b.s. loosing reputation (real-world not steemit), steemit loosing reputation, steemit needing to do something about it in its architecture, getting an approach from another angle towards the downvote/flagging-discussion,...

Thanks for the clarification again. No further questions.
Getting out of steem may be a wise decision; out of crypto entirely may be not.
Of course this is your choice. So forget that sentence.

Thanks, again, for the reply.

You could always start an anonymous account. As long as you don't pay for it with Steem, but with BTC from a hardware wallet, it should be difficult to trace for most.

c

  1. It gives you the option of earning without detection, provided you don't make any mistakes that give away your identity. (don't pay for it with Steem)

  2. It allows you to retaliate with multiple accounts that don't have open posts and can't be retaliated against. (playing their game)

Whether you find value in being here is up to you of course and the fact that ned is powering down suggests we should make similar moves. I am powering down also because I question the flag and up vote system; when compared to a market where you could take away a vendor's Euros, no vendor would be stupid enough to show up. I'm not moving my Steem off the platform, it just won't be powered up unless something changes.

"When plunder becomes a way of life for a group of men in a society, over the course of time they create for themselves a legal system that authorizes it and glorifies it" - Frederick Bastiat.

a

Not retarded. Flags were presented as a curation tool for disagreeing with the content of a post or excessive rewards for a post. The fact that someone could use it to go after every open post indefinitely was not mentioned, nor was the fact presented that such a process could be automated and used for revenge for any reason.

When used in this fashion, I disagree with this flag thing because I can determine for myself if I like or dislike a post and don't need others to filter out what they think is garbage. It actually makes the flag a useless tool for most account holders and available as a viable option for only a select few.

I'll check on your site regularly, I love history, and also Nordic history that has been absent from our schools. Greetings!

a