You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Onboarding the masses - SteemPress updated roadmap and growth strategy

in #steempress5 years ago

This all sounds great. But as usual...where there are strict rules involved, most people find a way around them. People do not like rules. We will see how this system plays out

Sort:  

I think people love rules. All creators I've talked to here would rather have clear rules for how they earn, and then make a plan for how they can make the best content, bring the most attention, and otherwise improve, to earn based on those rules, than face uncertainty.

Than maybe I'm staying with open minded people who like to contribute to the society, add some of their own ideas to it. If they (we) are living in society where we are always told what to do, we feel like 7 year old boys again, and feel the need to change that. I'm just saying.... In fact, I don't give a f :) but just so you know how your work looks like.

Yeah I get that some people, especially tho attracted to crypto, often feel like that. I'm just saying that I believe most people do want rules or at least guidelines by those with Steem Power as for what types of contributions they'll look to reward. If you think I'm wrong in thinking that most people want it, then I'm all ears.

Also, this plan doesn't impose rules, it only offers suggestions for what stakeholders considers as positive contributions that they look to reward. A clarity that is sorely missing atm, and a reason why so many leave frustarted.

I know what your goal is. But you are missing a point. We are still having autovotes - how will you scale added value on steem, improved retention, or time well spent? Sometimes not one person reads a blog, worth over $100. It's all based on details, words, seconds,... If you want owners of SP to change their mind, you got to be better than...let's say SPI ( SteemPower Investments) with around 46% per year

Votes should correlate better with value added. We can provide stakeholders with access to see both what curation projects bring the most return on delegation through curation rewards, as well as other KPIs like how many new Steem accounts are created through the blgos and websites they curate.

For STEEM investors who want to see their ROI in the 3000% range. Contributing to making STEEM a 10$token beats any closed voting circle. That's the only goal worth pursuing. People have to stop thinking of just their internal return from the inflation pool, as it means nothing versus the benefits of making STEEM/SP a more attractive asset to own.

Sorry, I didn't look at the comments. Sure. Idea is pretty good. I mean...we have put so many ideas out, and almost none of those were realised. I like to look at the history and what actually worked and was used at massive scale. Do you remember e-gold? e-gold was a grandpa of torrent system, and torrent system was father of bitcoin. I like stable price. Not falling price like steem, from $6 to $0.16 Us dollar is going to fall sharply in 2022. Not sure if having it in steem system is good idea. In fact, all fiat are falling daily.

To see steem at $10,steem would have to rise for like... at least 5% daily to get there. If you don't want to get grey hair until that time. I would love to stop thinking out of the box, believe me. I was thinking like that for long time. But every time I saw my word, my advice was worth nothing. I saw Steem is too centralised. Why do you think I am not writing blogs here any more? (maybe I will in future) Because I cherish my time way more than falling steem currency, where paid member is telling me what i can write and what I can not write with my second account... First you should fix that errors. You want to be decentralised? Than you may listen to Paul Rosenberg (or any cypherpunk member) or Andreas M. Antonopoulos....to learn what decentralisation means