You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Intel Drop #9 – The Level 4 Attacks Have Begun

in #thegreatreset2 months ago

Reassess the whole thing:

The great reset is real. They aren't hiding it's goals. The only things different are Forced Vaccinations and the Sovereign Class. What do the whistleblowers gain by bringing both of these things up, and how does that fracture or divide anyone who's awake?

There may be stuff you can do that makes a difference. You may not bother if you think the whole thing is rigged and your friends are lying to you.

Again, what do you lose by assuming that the whole thing is rigged and why wouldn't that prompt you to have a plan in place should SHTF/Reset is rolled out, knowing that its coming from all sides. What do they gain, and what do you lose? It'd be nice to "make a difference" against the cabal, but realistically that can only happen if you're on the inside. How can you get into there, other than going to the whistleblowers?

You're trying to verify evidence, what would that look like? You've avoided that question before, as well as the question regarding what evidence would be enough for you.

What does their claims have to do with your friends? Why is believing in their claims of Forced Vaccinations and Privileged classes detrimental to your friend's credibility?

This is a tight fight. If you doubt your allies then that can make the difference between victory and defeat. Therefore, it is a good attack to cause your enemy to do thus. "Divide and conquer"

It's not a tight fight, it's a very one sided fight and we are on the wrong side, blind, and completely overpowered, yet they can't be as nimble as us, among other qualities we possess like anonymity. So what allies are you speaking about? What attack are you speaking about, who's being divided, what group? Its one stupid argument after another, will you answer for all these stupid things you're talking about?

All that they ask is you share that they are planning Forced Vaccinations and that they have a privileged caste, or are you doubting that they will crash the dollar, and implement a digital version, and that you'll own nothing and be happy, that they want to microchip you, feed you bugs and who knows what else as they take complete control over the internet?

What do you rationalize the World Trade Center Number 7 collapse as? If they are willing and capable to take out 3000 people and collapse a building without any sort of rational explanation for, and ship off every pound of debris to China, why wouldn't you conclude that they are willing to go to extreme lengths to pull off this conspiracy, especially when they killed those 3000 people only as a very poor pretense for invading Iraq?

They blew up the audit office in the Pentagon with a missile, and the trillions are still unaccounted for.

There was an article published in 2014 by The New Yorker, titled "1% Jokes and Plutocrats in Drag: what I saw when I crashed a Wall Street Party". I might have messed up the title slightly, but I'm certain you can find it and it should be revealing as to what we are up against.


I appreciate knowing what has a real possibility of happening. But, there are two angles that they are liable for:

  1. At any time, there can be a call for a special sale of becoming Sovereign. This is the most obvious, and I see there is much denying they would or could do this.
  2. By naming trusted pundits as Gatekeepers, they are sowing doubt. Pure propaganda of discouragement.

If they are telling the truth then these liabilities are unfortunate and they would do well to further shore up their case by showing supporting evidence of #2. I already mentioned one idea of a bitcoin transaction - the transaction hash ID, but I don't know what else they can supply that is verifiable. #1 is just hanging out there and they are doing all they can to dispel that. If they simply refused to name any gatekeepers they would be more believable to me.

It is possible that they list so many conservative pundits so that they would mention that they have been named and deny it - thus spreading the story. I don't know if this has worked so far. I watched an Alex Jones video entitled something like "Breaking: the technology behind the Great Reset!" ... looking for CSRQ to be mentioned. No, it was not mentioned. Alex himself didn't do the segment, and the host mentioned many times how much Alex has done to expose the Great Reset. In the end, this seemed to play into the CSRQ narrative. But it also could have been they had considered reporting on it but decided not to because it implicated him and he can say he didn't want to spread a baseless conspiracy theory.

There have been stories with verifiable information (Hunter Biden laptop, for instance) that were suppressed. What chance does a fascinating narrative that can only make claims have of spreading around. The gravity of this keeps this from spreading like an urban legend.

 2 months ago  Reveal Comment