Your contribution cannot be approved yet because it is not as informative as other contributions. See the Utopian Rules. Please edit your contribution and add try to improve the length and detail of your contribution (or add more images/mockups/screenshots), to reapply for approval.
Hi @steemitph
I'm afraid there is not currently enough here to warrant approval. The main focus of the subimission is to say that the 50/50 - 100% power-up choice has changed about 4%.
This is not really enough information to give, and therefore lacks analysis. Could you add some more information for the timeframe you used?
Thanks
You may edit your post here, as shown below:
You can contact us on Discord.
[utopian-moderator]
Hi @abh12345, I love it that we are becoming more critical of the contributions in the analysis category. I can already think of data-points to add to show the changing behavior pattern. I will work on that as soon as I am freed up from my day job. Thanks again for taking a look.
Thanks for your understand @steemitph.
This is for the good of @utopian-io in the long run.
Have a nice day :)
I have edited this to add a chart showing a trend of gradual change in payout preference for a 30 day period. Please let me know if this now meets the new standard.
Hi @stemitph
The gradual change chart works much better than the pie charts thank you.
For the future of this analysis type, as we have 20 months data, a longer comparision would be much better.
This could be then compared to the changes in Steem price over the analysed period, or the implementation of Hard Forks.
I have approved the contribution.
Thank you.
Hey @abh12345, I appreciate that. As I mentioned earlier I like and support the new (more critical) rules. That will require us to keep improving the level of data we present to the analysis category of utopian. Thank you most specially for the tips.