Your entire argument about him being a part of a cult is based on the fact that he looks like one of the kids in the cult.
That's quite an exaggeration. You might want to read the article again?
If you think that all of the kids look the same then I suggest that you take a closer look. There are many differences between the children that can easily be used to differentiate between them e.g eye color, nose, teeth, straight vs wavy or curly hair - and these are just the very obvious ones.
Then we have his mother in a relationship with one of the cult members for 3 years. Assange would also have had to change schools every 3 months to attend 37 schools. In part 2 it seems that he was working with NASA and one of his old hacker buddies (Mudge) states that Julian told him that NASA & DARPA paid for his university tuition between 2003-2006.
In part 1 & part 2 - I wrote that some evidence is more credible and relevant than others but just because you reject one piece of evidence it does not mean that other evidence is false - which seems to be what you have done.
I suggest that you see the rest of the evidence. We haven't even got to the good stuff that happens in 2006 onwards when WL's launches.
He has done more good than bad and has shown that this is about more than money.
Yes he has done a lot of good. I've never disputed that.
If you don't think that money is important to Assange you probably won't like my next post because it proves that money was very important to Assange, even before WL launched. Later posts will again cover the financial aspect.
I hope that you will read it and keep and open-mind.
Thank you for commenting!