You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: AI-Generated Content = Not Original Content

in #ailast year

Midjourney and other art generators apply here and we'll adjust going forward. I strongly recommend that no one attempts to pass off generated art as their own as that is both fraud and an insult to the hard-working artists who create work for Hive with their own talents. It's not worth lying about.

Sort:  

Midjourney terms state that paying members own the created works and can be used with out attribution. Posting such would clearly not be fraud. Should it be rewarded... in a vacuum I don't think so; but there is going to need to be a little more nuance. If I were to build a logo for a project with licensed AI or pay to have one designed it would soon become a trademark in practice and no attribution would be necessary in either case.

AI is going to continue driving the cost of things lower and lower. This is a good thing because we will all have to work less and less. I hope hivewatchers can balance AI reward farming with AI as a productivity tool(grammerly, just typing in japanese...). It's not going away.

If you were using Midjourney to make a logo or let's say a title graphic, that makes sense. If you used Midjourney to create a pile of art and then presented it as if you had hand-drawn it, that's an entirely different matter.

lets be honest its about reducing the rewards so they go to the dhf