All I am saying there is no need to post old content for rewards.
As for content that is valuable I can sort of disagree with this. Hive is always getting new users. It takes time to scroll back and read post from 8 months ago.
The problem is not so much the rewards, the problem is the curation auto voters that give out the reward. If all, (which I know is an impossibility), were done manually then this would not even be an issue.
It there were no autovoters following her content then the only votes she would get would be from new users. A short solution would be for the auto voters to check a list of accounts that are known re-posters and not vote on them.
However, we do have autovotes. Until we execute a hard fork they are not going away, if at all. So it's a moot point isn't it?
It is, as is the reposting of content. I do not think auto votes need to go away, but to place blame on a person that repost and then gets a lot of rewards is not right. The person re-posting is not at fault for the excessive rewards. Having them state it is a re-post is not going to stop the auto votes from rolling in.
Excessive rewards can only be placed on one group, and that is the individuals voting via auto votes.