There are far more than 4, I only mentioned a few to make a point. But more importantly, claiming what we report to be ‘no fact’ truth without ever disputing the claims and source material with any evidence does nothing to demonstrate a lack of factual reporting on our part. Maybe instead of rampant downvoting, engage in debate, dispute claims with counter claims, challenge our source material with alternative source material, you know, attempt to show that our ‘truths’ are indeed devoid of facts as you claim.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
What?! Actually being open to debate, or any form of challenging their preconceived beliefs? Actually presenting evidence? Counter claims?
That's something a dangerous anti-government conspiracy theorist would recommend!
It's simple, you're speaking heresy, and they won't have it.