While I agree with you're artical, I still feel like getting Adam on a national (or even international) stage proclaiming the true message of liberty will serve, as Ron Paul did, to wake many of our slumbering brothers & sisters. I do not think Adam will ever be allowed to take the Oval Office but, I do think we can use the campaign as a platform to get our message to a mainstreem audience that otherwise wouldn't have gotten exposure to that message.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
I hear you. But.
The campaign platform isn’t Voluntaryist, and he claims to be a Voluntaryist. That is what I take issue with. Plus all the donations being requested that anarchists could be using for themselves and other, non-presidential campaign (state legitimizing) initiatives.
I’m not worried about “winning believers” anymore, but principle, and not trampling on the natural law rights of even one individual.
Adam’s own statements on his run are contradictory and confused, and that is just going to make honest Voluntaryists look silly, anyway, and not help the overarching goal of the philosophy or the “cause.”
It’s just another distraction, as far as I can tell. Much like the Trump campaign. Voluntaryists don’t need a leader. Kokesh has said they do.
No doubt there are some contradictions on the method. Lot's to think about, thanks.
Well, I always do as well, so I’ll keep what you said in mind. Thanks for commenting.
Yeah buddy. This is a complicated issue so talking about it is important to dig out which ideas hit bedrock of TRUTH & can be built upon.
For example, this proves he is either lying or ignorant of Voluntaryist property ethic:
Nice job here...thank you for the video.