You don't imply it? Actually, you state very explicitly right at the top that privacy features are "the big casualty" of the disagreement between Ken and Chris. Your intention may not be to FUD Bitshares, but that is exactly what you are doing.
The big casualty ?
Private transactions in the #bitshares blockchain.
I want it resolved too. But what does this have to do with stealth? Again, Ken's work on stealth continues. Granted, it should NOT be necessary for @onceuponatime to provide alternative funding (which I am thankful for). But that is another matter entirely!
all I want is for this very important matter to move forward, so that we can all keep pushing #bitshares >forward.
I believe that it is obvious from both the surrounding context of the wording and the general tone of the text (in your opinion, FUD, in my opinion, attempting to galvanize the community and the main protagonists of this episode into finding a solution by reminding everyone of the greater good in doing so) that what you claim is not the case.
Likewise, I find it in extremely poor taste that you use your extreme weight on this platform to downvote this post to oblivion, but self-evidently you see the motivation behind this action differently.
Just remember this: we're both invested in BTS and we both want it to succeed.
As for the rest - let's just agree to disagree.
Where would BTS be without people like onceuponatime. The guy has stepped up again and again for the project. Thank you good sir!
< appropriate gif that celebrates onceuponatime.gif >
I spent a long night
Not too long ago.
I was sittin' around
With the mafio.
They were trying to steal control of the Vision!
Well, I said: patahhh!
You can try if you want to.
But power comes from within.
***************StoneEagle
They thought they can escape "elegantly"
Children these days! Sheeesh! No respect.
lol
haha