You bring up a good point and I understand it. However, this post wasn't intended to be a legal article of analysis of the case. This was just meant to be a satire.
That said, what I said was just oversimplification of what you have clarified.
You bring up a good point and I understand it. However, this post wasn't intended to be a legal article of analysis of the case. This was just meant to be a satire.
That said, what I said was just oversimplification of what you have clarified.