Your claim....offered as fact....that dan is undermining the value of the token and the community is absurd and unsubstantiated.
My opinion is that he adds value to Steem when he posts and my opinion is that he should keep his rewards.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
@baah we may end up disagreeing, and that's ok bud. Would you consider EOS, which is nothing like steem is an essential tool that must be built and is not in direct competition with Steem. The price of Steem means very little in the short term. Try even to imagine what will happen in 50 years....this whole blockchain thing is more important than disruption in the present. Steem is not Steemit. Their stake is a bit of a problem but the Steem chain's true utility will be decided by hundreds of developers and millions of users. Dan should absolutely use Steem to promote the technologies he develops that protect us all. Steem is the only place worth publishing anything. :)