Is the suggestion being made that if its indeed Dan (blocktrades), then it's OK to freeze the funds and steal them?
I mean, does it matter who the funds belong to? What if they belong to Iran's government, would that make theft OK?
I'm confused as to the need to contort like this to "justify" the action.
I think the concern is that, if it's really Dan, it's a false flag attack. That he intentionally invented a victim to crush Steemit's remaining reputation. Or if he didn't send the funds on purpose, he fabricated a maximally sympathetic backstory (bright-eyed new investor just like Sun, cruelly betrayed) and milked it to the same ends.
mad props if true, but I doubt it
hive가 먼저 도둑질을 했다.
무료 돈을받지 못하는 것은 도둑질입니다. 고마워, 나는 이것을 배울 필요가 있었다.
an eye for an eye leaves the whole world blind
vengeance is not justice
It's probably futile of me to ask for people to cool their engines. Forks are almost always born in tumultuous situations, and regardless of the passage of time, the rivalries don't actually just disappear.
All that being said, we all know that two wrongs don't make a right... or at least we should all know this.