Hive

Comments

cardeegel (49)in PRAETORIA • 13 days ago
RE: New Land Cards? Man and his best friend
Does land really need more general boosts? There are millions more resources produced than consumed each and every day. The only thing which keeps land resources prices up is…
$0.00
1 1
cardeegel (49)in #spsproposal • 18 days ago
RE: SPS DAO Proposal - Remove Option to Purchase Potions with Glint
I would say if you use reward chests payed for by glint can use potions they should be buyable with glint. It's not like you can buy all the new potions with glint, so I guess…
$0.00
0 0
cardeegel (49)in #spsproposal • 19 days ago
RE: SPS Governance Proposal - Don't Change PP Values
My understanding was always that modern cards have the penalty and cards no longer playable in modern don't. Otherwise modern cards are just second rate cards that will…
$0.00
0 0
cardeegel (49)in #splinterlands • last month
RE: Seventh Conclave Arcana Conflicts Airdrop
This sum.. I mean archon + Rush Townsend = 2x5 range damage in round 0 (and likely another 2x5 immediately after due to the high speed). 20 range damage before the enemy can…
$0.00
1 0
cardeegel (49)in #spsproposal • 3 months ago
RE: SPS Governance Proposal - Amend Miniset Proposal
I don't try to approach it from a position of trying to do a different proposal. I already voted for this, because it is better than not having it. I just try to mitigate…
$0.00
0 1
cardeegel (49)in #spsproposal • 3 months ago
RE: SPS Governance Proposal - Amend Miniset Proposal
At the risk of being annoying with it, this makes it again a bit more complicated than it has to be. A card having a CP score, a PP score, now additionally a conflict score which…
$0.00
0 3
cardeegel (49)in #spsproposal • 3 months ago
RE: SPS Governance Proposal - Amend Miniset Proposal
I like what I read for the most part, but it is again so many small things packed together in one big yes or no proposal. I don't think splitting into wagon kits and wagon…
$0.03
Past Payouts $0.03
- Author $0.01
- Curators $0.01
7 2
cardeegel (49)in #spsproposal • 4 months ago
RE: Proposal to cancel low participation tournaments
You have to at least submit your teams, if you don't you don't win, but submitting any team and not winning still counts, but it has been a long time since I actually managed to…
$0.00
0 1
cardeegel (49)in #spsproposal • 4 months ago
RE: Proposal to cancel low participation tournaments
There is discussion in the tournament discord right now about a modification / followup proposal to make the tournaments happen again. There are also average participations for…
$0.00
0 0
cardeegel (49)in #spsproposal • 4 months ago
RE: Proposal to cancel low participation tournaments
I said most CA. The ones cancelled are typically tournaments with heavy card restrictions or Expert level tournaments with very high CP requirements. Simply tournaments for which…
$0.00
0 1
cardeegel (49)in #spsproposal • 4 months ago
RE: Proposal to cancel low participation tournaments
I understand completely what you mean and I discussed the scaling down you describe in some draft versions, but I really don't like proposals that include too many changes where…
$0.00
0 0
cardeegel (49)in #spsproposal • 4 months ago
RE: Proposal to cancel low participation tournaments
This all sounds reasonable, but would require quite some rework of tournaments. A major advantage of the proposal above is, that it is very low effort.
$0.00
0 0
cardeegel (49)in #spsproposal • 4 months ago
RE: Proposal to cancel low participation tournaments
This is not an anti GF proposal, most GF modern or wild are not affected. It mostly hits exotic configurations like GF Diamond alpha and untamed only. Yes it will drive away some…
$0.00
0 2
cardeegel (49)in #spsproposal • 4 months ago
RE: Proposal to cancel low participation tournaments
You would have to check the tournaments, but most GF CA, GF modern and GF wild are not affected. Examples of affected tournaments are GF Diamond alpha and untamed only. That…
$0.00
1 3
cardeegel (49)in #spsproposal • 4 months ago
RE: Proposal to cancel low participation tournaments
To be exact, they are not cancelled, they are still created, they just won't happen if not enough players sign up. I didn't want to overload the proposal and keep it focused, but…
$0.02
Past Payouts $0.02
- Author $0.01
- Curators $0.01
3 2
cardeegel (49)in #spsproposal • 4 months ago
RE: Proposal to cancel low participation tournaments
My understanding is, that you have to define the minimum participation rate as well as the tournament prize positions in advance. Which means you could host a tournament…
$0.00
1 1
cardeegel (49)in Splinterlands • 5 months ago
RE: SPS Governance Proposal - Adjust the efficiency of rented and delegated SPS
I think this is the wrong direction. You should give SPS more utility not less and reducing renting/delegation efficiency is reducing utility. If you want more benefit to…
$0.00
0 1
cardeegel (49)in #spsproposal • 6 months ago
RE: SPS Governance Proposal - Adjust Token Distribution Strategy
Hmm, how to vote if I like the slow down but definitely not the distribution of the added tokens. I guess it won't matter anyway how I vote, but these omnibus proposals are not…
$0.00
1 1
cardeegel (49)in #spsproposal • 6 months ago
RE: SPS Governance Proposal - Extend Staking Rewards
This proposal is about allocating additional SPS to staking rewards. So if anything, this is going against the whitepaper, by prolonging the staking rewards which are set to…
$0.00
0 0
cardeegel (49)in #spsproposal • 6 months ago
RE: SPS Governance Proposal - Extend Staking Rewards
I would argue emissions can be reduced by offering alternatives to SPS rewards as well. Why not have the option for rewards to be purely in glint, for those who just want to get…
$0.03
Past Payouts $0.03
- Author $0.02
- Curators $0.02
2 0