Hive

Comments

cardeegel (49)in #spsproposal • 4 days ago
RE: SPS Governance Proposal - Amend Miniset Proposal
I don't try to approach it from a position of trying to do a different proposal. I already voted for this, because it is better than not having it. I just try to mitigate…
$0.00
0 1
cardeegel (49)in #spsproposal • 6 days ago
RE: SPS Governance Proposal - Amend Miniset Proposal
At the risk of being annoying with it, this makes it again a bit more complicated than it has to be. A card having a CP score, a PP score, now additionally a conflict score which…
$0.00
0 3
cardeegel (49)in #spsproposal • 7 days ago
RE: SPS Governance Proposal - Amend Miniset Proposal
I like what I read for the most part, but it is again so many small things packed together in one big yes or no proposal. I don't think splitting into wagon kits and wagon…
$0.03
Pending payout amount: $0.03
Breakdown: 0.01 HBD, 0.13 HP
Payout in 2 hours
7 2
cardeegel (49)in #spsproposal • last month
RE: Proposal to cancel low participation tournaments
You have to at least submit your teams, if you don't you don't win, but submitting any team and not winning still counts, but it has been a long time since I actually managed to…
$0.00
0 1
cardeegel (49)in #spsproposal • last month
RE: Proposal to cancel low participation tournaments
There is discussion in the tournament discord right now about a modification / followup proposal to make the tournaments happen again. There are also average participations for…
$0.00
0 0
cardeegel (49)in #spsproposal • 2 months ago
RE: Proposal to cancel low participation tournaments
I said most CA. The ones cancelled are typically tournaments with heavy card restrictions or Expert level tournaments with very high CP requirements. Simply tournaments for which…
$0.00
0 1
cardeegel (49)in #spsproposal • 2 months ago
RE: Proposal to cancel low participation tournaments
I understand completely what you mean and I discussed the scaling down you describe in some draft versions, but I really don't like proposals that include too many changes where…
$0.00
0 0
cardeegel (49)in #spsproposal • 2 months ago
RE: Proposal to cancel low participation tournaments
This all sounds reasonable, but would require quite some rework of tournaments. A major advantage of the proposal above is, that it is very low effort.
$0.00
0 0
cardeegel (49)in #spsproposal • 2 months ago
RE: Proposal to cancel low participation tournaments
This is not an anti GF proposal, most GF modern or wild are not affected. It mostly hits exotic configurations like GF Diamond alpha and untamed only. Yes it will drive away some…
$0.00
0 2
cardeegel (49)in #spsproposal • 2 months ago
RE: Proposal to cancel low participation tournaments
You would have to check the tournaments, but most GF CA, GF modern and GF wild are not affected. Examples of affected tournaments are GF Diamond alpha and untamed only. That…
$0.00
1 3
cardeegel (49)in #spsproposal • 2 months ago
RE: Proposal to cancel low participation tournaments
To be exact, they are not cancelled, they are still created, they just won't happen if not enough players sign up. I didn't want to overload the proposal and keep it focused, but…
$0.02
Past Payouts $0.02
- Author $0.01
- Curators $0.01
3 2
cardeegel (49)in #spsproposal • 2 months ago
RE: Proposal to cancel low participation tournaments
My understanding is, that you have to define the minimum participation rate as well as the tournament prize positions in advance. Which means you could host a tournament…
$0.00
1 1
cardeegel (49)in Splinterlands • 2 months ago
RE: SPS Governance Proposal - Adjust the efficiency of rented and delegated SPS
I think this is the wrong direction. You should give SPS more utility not less and reducing renting/delegation efficiency is reducing utility. If you want more benefit to…
$0.00
0 1
cardeegel (49)in #spsproposal • 3 months ago
RE: SPS Governance Proposal - Adjust Token Distribution Strategy
Hmm, how to vote if I like the slow down but definitely not the distribution of the added tokens. I guess it won't matter anyway how I vote, but these omnibus proposals are not…
$0.00
1 1
cardeegel (49)in #spsproposal • 4 months ago
RE: SPS Governance Proposal - Extend Staking Rewards
This proposal is about allocating additional SPS to staking rewards. So if anything, this is going against the whitepaper, by prolonging the staking rewards which are set to…
$0.00
0 0
cardeegel (49)in #spsproposal • 4 months ago
RE: SPS Governance Proposal - Extend Staking Rewards
I would argue emissions can be reduced by offering alternatives to SPS rewards as well. Why not have the option for rewards to be purely in glint, for those who just want to get…
$0.03
Past Payouts $0.03
- Author $0.02
- Curators $0.02
2 0
cardeegel (49)in #spsproposal • 4 months ago
RE: SPS Governance Proposal - Extend Staking Rewards
I'm absolutely against allocating any more SPS for staking rewards. Why should the DAO reward the mere holding of SPS, if on the other hand it wants to be paid for the mini-set…
$0.00
0 2
cardeegel (49)in #spsproposal • 4 months ago
RE: SPS Governance Proposal - Hire SMC To Create a New Mini-Set
Until it hits 0.1425 cent you simply overpay when you use any other form of currency. By a lot. Imagine you are a new player, wanting to buy a pack, you have most likely credits…
$0.00
0 1
cardeegel (49)in #spsproposal • 4 months ago
RE: SPS Governance Proposal - Hire SMC To Create a New Mini-Set
I voted for it and I like the idea in general, but the whole pay different prices in DEC, SPS and USDC is really bad in my opinion to say it in a neutral tone. Realistically…
$0.02
Past Payouts $0.02
- Author $0.01
- Curators $0.01
3 3
cardeegel (49)in #spsproposal • 5 months ago
RE: Reintroduction of leagues to Splinterlands
Personally I would rather see more different types of game modes instead of artificial league borders squeezed into the existing ones. The system as it was, was really bad, not…
$0.00
0 4