I don't try to approach it from a position of trying to do a different proposal. I already voted for this, because it is better than not having it. I just try to mitigate (completely subjective) issues with small changes.
Our proposal system is not great for community input because as soon as the wider community knows about it, it is basically a vote. That is why I mostly suggest changes that (again completely subjective) could be done in the scope of the original proposal without changing the spirit of the proposal.
My understanding is:
- Proposal wants to mitigate the conflict score of BF cards.
- The proposal doesn't state that the CP of BF cards must stay the same and DAO law says what the CP of a BF must be.
- Therefore it is not requiring a new proposal if the conflict score of BF cards is reduced by reducing the CP.
there's several things happening in the proposal, not just the conflict score.
The proposal was needed because of the change to the pack types, everything else probably could've be done by the team. But why not include the full picture so that everyone can see how its all connected, that way they don't object to the changes after they are released?
Keep in mind that there were many people on both sides of these Conflicts issues, and some were vehemently upset with some parts of it. To be fair to everyone, and to get a good gauge of sentiment, its better to include all the changes for that full picture.