• Sign in
  • Sign up 
  • Welcome
  • FAQ
  • Block Explorer 
  • Night Mode
  • Stolen Accounts Recovery 
  • Change Account Password 
  • Vote for Witnesses 
  • Hive Proposals 
  • OpenHive Chat 
  • Developer Portal 
  • Hive Whitepaper 
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
logo
  • Posts
  • Proposals
  • Witnesses
  • Our dApps
LoginSign up

geotrope (25)Hivebuzz level badge

76 followers7 posts1 following7 HP
Blacklisted Users
Muted UsersFollowed BlacklistsFollowed Muted Lists

Joined August 2016 Active 9 years ago

  • Blog
  • Posts
  • Replies
  • Social
  • Notifications
  • Wallet
  • steemitboard (66)in #climate • 6 years ago
    featured

    RE: Wind power now exceeds nuclear

    Congratulations @geotrope! You received a personal award! Birthday! - You are on the Steem blockchain for 3 years! You can view your badges on your Steem Board and…
    $0.00
       0 0
    • steemitboard (66)in #climate • 8 years ago
      featured

      RE: Wind power now exceeds nuclear

      Congratulations @geotrope! You have received a personal award! Happy Birthday - 1 Year on Steemit Happy Birthday - 1 Year on Steemit Click on the badge to view your own…
      $0.00
         0 0
      • wizwom (48)in #climate • 9 years ago

        RE: Wind power now exceeds nuclear

        No, you are completely misrepresenting the availability of the power source. If gas plants had to shut down for half of every day, or for days at a time randomly, no one would…
        $0.00
           0 0
        • wizwom (48)in #climate • 9 years ago

          RE: Wind power now exceeds nuclear

          I countered your "current are experimental" - it is compete B.S., not borne out by the actual data.
          $0.00
             0 0
          • wizwom (48)in #climate • 9 years ago

            RE: Wind power now exceeds nuclear

            Yes, but that 0.29 is by choosing the BEST wind locations with the lowest ROI times. As additional farms go in, they go in worse and worse places. Furthermore, the time to…
            $0.00
               0 2
            • wizwom (48)in #climate • 9 years ago

              RE: Wind power now exceeds nuclear

              Intermittency means you need another equivalent total capacity Which means you lose all captal and fuel lowering once you take the complete system to provide X Mw to the grid.
              $0.00
                 0 2
              • wizwom (48)in #climate • 9 years ago

                RE: Wind power now exceeds nuclear

                Furthermore: US fleet CF is over 0.9; and wind is closer to 0.2 - the best wind locations get CFs over 0.3, but they are already installed and additional wind will just end up…
                $0.00
                   0 4
                • lukestokes (76)in #tech • 9 years ago

                  RE: How Does One Get Around the Following Error?: comment.last_payout == fc::time_point_sec::min()

                  I think the payout window has been updated to 24 hours as of today. All of this is beta, so I wouldn't count on user-friendly error messages any time soon. If you want to…
                  $0.00
                     0 0
                  • wizwom (48)in #climate • 9 years ago

                    RE: Wind power now exceeds nuclear

                    So what, wiuth a CF of 0.2, they would have to install 5x th capacity to match the power production. And with subsidies for building windmills and selling the power from…
                    $0.00
                       0 4
                    • seyacat (45)in #climate • 9 years ago

                      RE: Wind power exceed nuclear

                      Nice to see good news.
                      $0.00
                         0 0