you are right. But it is even worse than you say it is.
The justification for attack came after some big upvotes from one account.
The % of the reward pool was claimed to be about 6% but was about 0.6%
and the original large up votes came from an account that i suspect is owned by the accuser. This is the second time i have seen this strategy used. Its a new use for the phrase 'false flag attack' lol
Each of us needs to look carefully into the claims that are being made. We simply can not afford to blindly believe what people say. We have tools available to find out for ourselves what is going on. Use them
You are viewing a single comment's thread from: