Organic and Inorganic Intelligence - Peteyboy and Mac
The term "Artificial Intelligence" (AI) has been used for several decades to describe the field of computer science and engineering focused on creating machines that can perform tasks that typically require human intelligence, such as problem-solving, decision-making, language understanding, and more. However, some experts argue that this term is not entirely accurate and could be replaced with "Inorganic Intelligence" (II) instead.
The main reason for this suggestion is that the term "artificial" implies that the intelligence created by machines is somehow fake or not genuine. This connotation could lead to misunderstandings about the nature and potential of AI, as well as negative perceptions among the public. On the other hand, the term "inorganic" refers to something that is not derived from organic matter, such as minerals or chemicals, which is more accurate when describing intelligence that originates from a non-biological source.
Another reason why "Inorganic Intelligence" might be a better term than "Artificial Intelligence" is that it highlights the fundamental difference between human and machine intelligence. While human intelligence is based on the biological structures and processes of the brain, machine intelligence relies on the physical components and algorithms programmed by humans. Therefore, calling it "inorganic" emphasizes the fact that machine intelligence is fundamentally different from human intelligence.
Moreover, "Inorganic Intelligence" also has a more futuristic and advanced connotation, which is fitting for the rapidly evolving field of AI. The term suggests a type of intelligence that is beyond what we currently understand or can achieve with biological organisms. It also aligns with the idea of creating intelligent machines that can surpass human intelligence, which is a goal that many researchers in the field are working towards.
In conclusion, while "Artificial Intelligence" has become the widely accepted term for describing the field of machine intelligence, there are compelling reasons to consider replacing it with "Inorganic Intelligence." This alternative term more accurately describes the nature and potential of machine intelligence while avoiding negative connotations and emphasizing its differences from human intelligence.
Have You encountered AI, yet? Your shared thoughts are highly appreciated. This is a complex topic and I would like to explore its many unmentioned aspects.
Congratulations @beingtheuniverse! You have completed the following achievement on the Hive blockchain And have been rewarded with New badge(s)
Your next target is to reach 80 posts.
You can view your badges on your board and compare yourself to others in the Ranking
If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word
STOPTo support your work, I also upvoted your post!
Check out our last posts:
Support the HiveBuzz project. Vote for our proposal!
There is reasonable evidence that this article is machine-generated. Posting such content is considered fraud.
Fraud is discouraged by the community and may result in the account being Blacklisted.
Guide: Why and How People Abuse and Defraud
If you believe this comment is in error, please contact us in #appeals in Discord.
Unable to reach you via discord.
This content was not machine generated - but I used AI to edit it. The aspect of "inorganic intelligence" has been obvious to me since the advent of what is described as "artificial intelligence". But there is no such thing as "artificial intelligence". Behind every AI response lies human intelligence - from concept to content. Unless machines create machines that possess independent thought, there is no artificial intelligence.
Let me know if it is prohibited to use an AI editor.
Please try this one:
https://discord.gg/p9DN3D5
Same thing.
This is very strange. I have just checked and the link definitely works.
You can also try this link:
https://discord.gg/RZMq5Sd
I agree. But it is in line with my experiences - knowing now what we know, the same people that push for WWIII, are using all their available means to stifle dissent. You will go to jail now in Geemany for telling that the Russian SMO was not only not unprovoked, but definitely instigated. It could be my IP that is being blocked from using various websites. I was even told that it is my iPad that makes publishing impossible. As You can see here, this is not the case. Suffering from ASD, I have pretty much had it with all this truth bashing on behalf of the cretinuos string pullers.
