Yes, it seems to me intent should really be the deciding factor. If the "author" sources the AI content (as you did here), then writes their own conclusions based on that, then I have no problem upvoting the article. If they are using AI to simply post an article to get upvotes without acknowledging it's use, that is just trying to game the system and probably deserves a downvote. If they are somewhere in the middle, just ignoring it is probably the way to go. AI is here, that fact is irrefutable. It will be up to each of us individually to decide how we want to use it, how to reward it, or whether it should be flagged. There is no right answer.
I don't think the biggest problem is going to be these articles being generated. In my opinion, the biggest problem will be when they start feeding each other with circle jerks of AI voting. That is what needs to be uncovered and stopped as soon as it appears.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta