I don't think you really understood my point there. In my write up I said "...so it could be an approach to help you reduce sensitivity to allergens". The key word here is could which according to oxford dictionaries says;
we use could to talk about less definite aspects of possibility or suggested options, either now or in the future.
My point is that many of these arguments have tons of research that actively debunks the claims or only half-heartedly supports them and only does so because they haven't gone through a true peer review. That was using one example to show how weak it is to be claimed as an "Amazing health benefit of drinking a glass of warm water with honey every morning " and it was one of the stronger of the claims. The other strong claim is with honey being able to reverse antibiotic resistance (it can't btw, bacteria can develop a resistance to the honey just like all others and it isn't a very strong antibiotic and only affects a specific type of antibiotic resistance, generalized claims are bad for arguments)
Saying there are benefits to drinking honey, fine, but back up your claims. You use two very questionable (and very unreliable) sources. Like want me to start pulling out problems with your post and back each one up completely?
So just to clarify, since that one reason discussed above is potentially a benefit, does that mean that this post only outlines 6 true benefits to drinking a warm glass of honey? (the answer is no btw, if you want a full reason then I will gladly tear each invalid point apartt)