I find this rather intriguing since the last couple months I've been listening to a lot of this stuff about Epstein's involvement with bitcoin. Maybe you can add to the insight of all the outer noise other than buy the rumor sell the news being put into this. What you are saying add relevance to two certain objectives. First establishing that all parties involved, whether it's to the creator of bitcoin, in and of itself, be Finney, Sassiman, or outright Epstein himself, but for sure the later having been the one who funded the development of taking bitcoin to a store of value, instead of a peer to peer cash system, which of course, as you mentions, will make eCash a failure, those individuals are all dead. They are leaning on that justification for just "taking it", but they aren't going to just "take it" without "selling the news" via a movie release. Timing is everything in Trump's world. So I am assuming this 1:1 airdrop will involve "all" the holders of bitcoin, including the US treasury. Though I highly doubt they will come right out and say that, of course not, there would be a motivation beyond the already heighten corruption in this administration that they aren't beyond stealing from the dead. August makes sense in regards to the announcement that tether will undergo an audit in August, the only audit ever done with tether revealed they could back only fifty percent of their stable coin. Since then, tether has never had another audit, nor is any firm wanting to jump at the chance to be "their" auditor, at least as this point. US commerce secretary Howard Lutnick, in a whole other aspect of incredible corruption profiting, his firm, Cantor Fitzgerald, invested four hundred million into tether under the exclusive contract they get the US treasury stable coin business. Chances are better than not they can't pass an audit. Those chances would take a big turn if they could "rob" some dead man's wallet of billions in a 1:1 airdrop into the US treasury while possibly siphoning off whatever else they could run short on to make that audit pass muster. And/or, if people start selling their bitcoin before the drop, they'll be picking up the buy opportunities. All the "prevailing" winds are out there on this one, the movie, the audit announcement, so I wouldn't discount this one as lacking the "support" needed to take it to the next level, that support is already in place and incentivized already, you can bet your bottom dime on that, if this is, indeed, what they are aiming for. I don't think they'd go for it if they weren't one hundred percent sure they could pull it off, the only other alternative would be a huge expectation of liquidity hitting the market if this robber baron theme is a hoax, but if they lack funding to back the stable coin, they'd lack funding to buy that backing.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from: