"Are you saying that something done by God is immoral then?"
Not at all. The moral responsibility is that of the actors themselves. In the case of "governments," that would be every individual who harms his neighbor, either directly or through indirect support of those who cary out "government mandates."
Are you a moral person, Dave? Do you assign credit to God, or primordial soup, or "chance," or whatever you may believe your point of origin is (your parents?), for the good that you do?
If you were to murder someone, who would be to blame?
Do you believe morality exists at all?
I try to be. Of course I don't assign credit to God, because I don't believe a god exists. I don't believe my origin has a plan for me, while I have a sense that you believe that God has a plan for us all. Like him calling on you to share your faith. You seem to give God credit for some of your and other people's choices while not for others. If everything is part of his plan, doesn't that include all the people and organizations that make immoral choices? I just have trouble understanding how you make the distinction between the two, where you draw the line between the two and how can they both exists simultaneously.
My question regarding this specific thing you said was if you can call raising up a leader that you know would be immoral in advance as a moral act. I personally don't see it as a moral act because you are willfully causing harm to a large number of people.
Under a world view in which everything is God's plan, I would argue that God should take at least part of the blame. I'm not saying this because I think it really makes sense, I'm saying it to point out the contradiction of a perfect, just, all-knowing and all-powerful God choosing to create a universe in which suffering and immorality exists while somehow being shielded from any blame for the consequences of this actions and choices. Keep in mind, I'm not judging God, I'm highlighting a logical impossibility of both him being perfectly good while willfully causing suffering. In fact, the problem of evil is one of the reasons I find the idea of a god that is all-powerful and just while at the same time having created this flawed world unreasonable.
Depends on what you mean by exists actually. I believe that morality is a concept that we have and that we as a social species are inclined to have based on empathy and valuing well-being. But morality is subject to a value judgment and if you mean absolute morality with your question, then no, I don't believe absolute morality exists. In my opinion morality is clearly subjective as people might disagree if certain types or behaviors are moral and humanity's understanding of what is moral has evolved over time. For instance, I personally think that killing animals for food if you have other options to actually be immoral, but the majority of humanity seems to still disagree. The fact that opinions differ shows us that this concept of ours is subjective as we have no other way to establish what is moral besides opinion and individual value judgment.