Anarchy, Natural Law, Right vs. Wrong

in #anarchy5 years ago (edited)

Covering the Basics: Anarchy, Natural Law, Right vs. Wrong

The actual definition of the word anarchy is “the absence of rulers”.
This would mean recognizing that we are all equals and no one has the right or “divine right” to rule over another.

The typical definition of anarchy you will hear is that it is "the state of a society without authorities or a governing body and the general confusion and chaos resulting from that condition." If you really think about it, that is actually the current state of our society right now when you consider police brutality, government false flags, war and widespread mental health issues resulting from the lack of community, chemicals in our air/food/water/vaccines, etc.

Ultimately the overall health of a society is a direct mirror reflection of the level of knowledge and understanding its members have regarding right vs. wrong behavior.

The majority of people right now believe in authority/government and do not have a solid grasp of what constitutes a “right” or “wrong” action, so the current state of society is reflecting that.

The solution to this would be getting people to realize that it is actually wrong to enforce man-made laws that are not in alignment with Natural (sometimes called Universal) Law, along with getting people to agree on what constitutes a “right”. Once OVER HALF of the population can grasp this concept we will begin to see the start of widespread change.
*This doesn’t mean that smaller subsets or tribes of people can’t make it to freedom sooner.

Mark Passio explains Natural Law very well so definitely check out some of his work if you want to dig deeper into this concept.

Natural Law vs. Man's Law.jpg

In order to create a successful and harmonious society or sovereign tribe, it is essential for all members to be on the same page about what constitutes a “right” and what constitutes a “wrong”. Most people generally have some understanding of right and wrong behavior (empathy you might call it) but the concept itself isn’t something that is often talked about.

Screen Shot 2019-10-15 at 5.04.26 PM.png

Defintion of a RIGHT: Anything that does not cause harm to another, the only instance in which force/harm may be used is in an act of self-defense. You always have a RIGHT to defend yourself from someone trying to hurt or kill you.

Definition of a WRONG: Anything that causes harm to another, a comprehensive list would include Murder, Assault, Rape, Theft, Trespass, Coercion. These can all be considered forms of stealing.

Objective Morality & Right vs. Wrong Video Link:

Sort:  

Keep up the Great Work

Thank you ditto homie