“What statists of all types fail to understand is that anarchists don’t believe what they do from a utilitarian perspective."
It's pretty clearly a idealistic notion. I think there are a lot of people who think it is a practical notion and that's where the rub is. So you have a philosophy that makes you feel philosophically correct but that is unworkable in the real world. I think a lot of people would like a detailed and realistic plan for implementing such a vision. So what is the solution to that?
Morality is unworkable in the “real world.”
You sound like a goon. I have tried to engage with you many times. You’re unwilling to hear. Forcing folks to do things under threat of violence is immoral. If you think that the only inevitable way we can exist, then you’re not worth anyone’s time anyway and are a shitty ass human being.
Private companies already build roads.
Private companies already provide legal, defense, and CR services.
But even if they didn’t, saying violence is necessary for peace shows your brain and moral compass to be about as scrambled as it can get.
Private companies build roads under government contract on land that the government takes from people. That's how roads are built.
We have discussed that there are things like arbitration and security services that are in addition to and rely on public services. Your private security guards call the police. Your private arbitration keeps people out of the courts and only exist because the courts exist, the existence of courts is what drives people to use arbitration.
I have asked you a bunch of times and you usually respond in movie form and the movies have different answers to the question of: Why would anyone go to an arbitration without the threat of court?
Currently the government uses the threat of force to get people to attend court and oftentimes they don't, why would people go without the threat of force?
One of the movies you showed me had those that didn't comply being enslaved by private corporations, how is that not forcing folks to do things under the threat of violence?
I am sure I never said " violence is necessary for peace" you said that.
Good. Then you’re a Voluntaryist.
I thought you weren't talking to me anymore? I don't want to talk to you if you are going to down vote it again.