You are taught in the "government" indoctrination camps that you are lucky to be in a country that allows you to vote, and that you must vote to stay free. Is voting for a minimalist/libertarian candidate the legitimate way to move closer to a free society? No. Because "government" is not legitimate and any participation in their system is a show of support for it and lends credence to the belief that it is real and legitimate. Did you notice that the statists don't really care who you vote for as long as you vote? They are happier for you to vote for a candidate that is in opposition to their candidate than for you to not vote at all. Think about that carefully.
It is merely their desire to make the ruling class look legitimate. Is there such a thing as a "government limited to its proper functions?" Of course not. If it reached that point, it would no longer be a "government." It would be an anarchy, people cooperating under the Non Aggression Principle (NAP.) Anarchy doesn't mean no rules, just no rulers. There is no shortcut to becoming free. You can't use "government" to get rid of "government." People must be taught why it is not real and does not exist. It cannot exist without force. You cannot delegate to anyone the right to do something that you yourself have no right to do.
I upvote U