funbobby51,
Ok, here we go. Let's discuss real world.
--Is Individual Subjective Value what successful economies are based on, or Authoritarian Theory of value?
Until you answer this question about reality, I see no reason that you can understand real world ideas.
that's not an answer to my question.
The answer is the answer to your question.
no it's not.
Do you know what the 'Subjective Theory of Value' is?
Do you understand statism and the subjective theory of value are not the same?
Those questions are not "a detailed and realistic plan for implementing such a vision".
The plans exist. They are real. Socialism/Communism is based in statism. These have been proven to fail in reality. The lifecycle of failure for a socialist economy that ignores subjective value and operates a authority theory of value has historically been approx. 100 years.
Economies that are based on subjective value outside of socialism show no signs of failure.
Subjective value has already been implemented and in the areas that aren't suppressed by statism it flourishes while the statist systems slow grind down the capacity for tangible capital formation.
There is simply no contest or argument that Authoritarian theory of value is better than subjective theory of value. That is the real world, there are just some positions that continue to be antiquated.
I agree, socialism and communism are terrible and outdated.
Would you agree that the reasons it is terrible and outdated have to do with authoritarianism and suppression of subjective value?
it's terrible because of the former and outdated because its based on an anachronistic industrial era economic model.