The only rights a man possesses are those he can personally wrest from the clutches of another. As long as the people are brain-washed with the falsehood of peace through pacifism, government becomes a necessary institution to enforce proxy violence critical in maintaining our current level of prosperity. The near pathologic avoidance of violence has even reached to the point of modern men being unable to kill and butcher animals necessary for sustenance. 99% of all capitalist economic activity is catering to the dysfunction, perversion, and incompetence of the average man. Independent and self-sufficient population is anathema to the capitalist financiers.
In order to be free from government institutions and financial masters, the population, first, needs to be cleansed of the muck whose livelihood and being are solely dependent upon the modern corrupt system. Next, the worthy needs to be trained to be able to inflict and be responsible for violence required to preserve their rights. Finally, these will be mobilised to tear-down the current institutions and systems. In order to create a new world, we must destroy the old. It is not technology, but the will to power that is most necessary in gaining freedom.
Not gonna lie, much of what you say here is factual.
This is definitely part of the problem, and why utter demoralization is effected by state indoctrination from a very early age, which sets the stage for sheeple to be deranged by incessant propaganda for the rest of their lives.
However, it is facile to resort to mere savage brutality to undertake rational society. Genocide is nothing but barbarism, despite the irrationality of sheeple in their dedication to overlords. That it's almost unavoidable at this point is a sad state of affairs, entirely the fault of psychopaths that care only about their own power and horrifically abusing sheeple to aggrandize themselves. If psychopaths are deprived of institutional power, as decentralization will do, sheeple will be freed of the noxious propaganda that continually deranges them, and some of them at least may successfully be led by free, rational men to positively support society.
Free men are the enemy of psychopaths, who tell sheeple freedom is hell, and cause sheeple to target free men for bullying. Sheeple are just doing what they're told, and their opinions only matter to sheeple and psychopaths, absent mob violence. Intelligent men are nominally competent to avoid being targeted by irrational mobs.
Building a free voluntarist society by adopting means of production that enable the provision of goods and services by individuals and communities working together will supercede the overlord/serf paradigm, and as globalism institutes genocide, even sheeple will become able to grasp that their overlords intend to kill them and become useful to society decentralizing power and rendering institutions obsolete.
There is no point in seeking to do evil when undertaking to create a good society. Evil will be imposed by evil men unavoidably. The means justify the ends, not the other way around, and physics is the ultimate arbiter of power. Decentralization ultimately renders centralization obsolete, and this enables rational free men to simply increase decentralization in order to enable rational society to defeat rapine overlords bent on the horrors psychopaths seek.
It is not the will to power over others that is necessary, but the will to power over oneself without exception. Seeking power over others is a mental illness, and the opposite of freedom. Owning slaves makes one a slave to slavery; the tyranny of stuff writ in human sorrow. A slaver is not free, but captive to their own evil possession of slaves.
Owning no man enables one to be free of the burden of such captivity. In time, particularly as the ability to personally manufacture means of space travel eventuate, freedom will render oppression suicidally harmful to oppressors, as the profitability of voluntary society renders oppression noncompetitive.
Edit: rereading your comment, I note that it is not our rights we wrest from others, but our power to enforce our rights. This isn't merely semantics, but a substantive difference in basic principles that change our positions on every matter subsequent to them in our considerations. If you believed a wood chip was a nickel you would wrongly calculate your monetary possessions, which would make any subsequent financial plans erroneous by that amount. The difference betweenright and power is far more significant than the financial value of a nickel, and the effects of that misunderstanding may underly many positions and statements we are unable to agree on.
If you think those in power will blithely allow their position to wither away without lashing out with violence, then the voluntarist movement ought to surrender their rights immediately. The capacity to deliver death and destruction is the only basis of power in this world. The social, political, religious/moral authority are but collective lies and delusions used to hide the truth regarding the real legitimacy, upon which authority derives.
Sovereign individuals derive their autonomy from their ability to inflict pain, upon those who would wrest away their freedom. Without the will to kill, voluntary interaction is not possible, since voluntary interaction occurs between equals, not between master and slave. A slave has no will to kill, even to live; and would-be masters will kill, even for trivial reasons. Only killers can choose pacifism and fair exchage; others are condemned to it. The rights and freedom of individuals must be wrested from the clutches of the government and social institutions that seek to enslave men, by any means necessary.
Only those worthy of freedom can exercise their rights; the unworthy muck, readily surrenders their freedom, content to allow others to dictate their rights to them. In order to create a voluntarist society of sovereign individuals, the unworthy must be cleansed, along with those that would restrict the rights of man. For freedom, everything, even morality, must be sacrificed.