Notice that it has about the same amount of total votes though. It's as if the whales only upvote hype and don't want to actually upvote good advice. Something is suspicious when this earns only ~$100 from 800+ votes, while the other posts earn $4000+.
It could just be a fluke, but the fact is that the Steemit economy is highly imbalanced for now. I do see lots of hope for the future, but as it is, it's also reasonable for people to critique current problems.
I have seen excellent posts with 100+ likes generating just a few cents. His advice is pointless because he is already famous. how can people miss this. it really buffles me
My problem is not with him, but with several variables of the system that could be further refined to encourage better content. In fact, I think this is a great post and by far his best post, yet funnily enough, it earned the least amount of money: https://steemit.com/steemit/@dollarvigilante/want-to-be-a-steemillionaire-here-are-the-crucial-things-to-do-for-newbies-on-steemit
Notice that it has about the same amount of total votes though. It's as if the whales only upvote hype and don't want to actually upvote good advice. Something is suspicious when this earns only ~$100 from 800+ votes, while the other posts earn $4000+.
It could just be a fluke, but the fact is that the Steemit economy is highly imbalanced for now. I do see lots of hope for the future, but as it is, it's also reasonable for people to critique current problems.
I have seen excellent posts with 100+ likes generating just a few cents. His advice is pointless because he is already famous. how can people miss this. it really buffles me