I like the idea, but I am not quite convinced. You interpret the NAP according to a dictionary definition of aggression. If we do the same for the NTP, will people be any clearer about what nontransgression means? Transgressive has come to mean anything that makes people surprised or uncomfortable.
I'm very sympathetic to the idea that what makes sense about libertarianism or anarchocapitalism can be captured as a theory of property. I'm not sure we can fit it into a sound bite.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from: