Coefficient of performance
Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coefficient_of_performance
The coefficient of performance or COP (sometimes CP or CoP) of a heat pump, refrigerator or air conditioning system is a ratio of the useful heating or cooling provided to the work (energy) required.[1][2] Higher COPs equate to higher efficiency, lower energy (power) consumption and thus lower operating costs.
Instead of converting work to heat (which has a maximum efficiency of 100% and a COP less than or equal to one), heat pumps, air conditioners and refrigeration systems use work to move existing heat from one place to another. Less work is required to move heat than to generate heat. Usually, more heat is moved than the amount of work put in so the COP usually exceeds 1, especially in heat pumps. Most air conditioners have a COP of 3.5 to 5.[3]
While the coefficient of performance is a term commonly used with heat pumps, it is also applicable to any energy system that behaves in a thermodynamically open manner, receiving energy from the local environment, whether it be electromagnetic, electrostatic, or any other viable form.[1]
A difference between the dimensionless terms efficiency and COP is that the numerator in COP is the heat moved or generated, in contrast to the numerator in efficiency being only the heat generated. Additionally, efficiency cannot be used to evaluate the ability of a device to cool, because the useful output energy is undefined in this case.
As an example, if a heat pump has an internal compressor efficiency of 70% and the user supplies 1.2 kW of power to run the unit and 6.5 kW is drawn from the local thermal environment, then COP is 6.5/1.2 ≈ 5.417. The efficiency is already taken into account in the 6.5 kW; if the compressor efficiency is higher, it is expected to be higher than 6.5 kW (more heat moved) for the same input power.
The COP is highly dependent on operating conditions, especially absolute temperature and relative temperature between sink and system, and is often graphed or averaged against expected conditions.[4]
Performance of absorption refrigerator chillers is typically much lower, as they are not heat pumps relying on compression, but instead rely on chemical reactions driven by heat.[5]
The equation is:
where
The COP for heating and cooling are different because the heat reservoir of interest is different. When one is interested in how well a machine cools, the COP is the ratio of the heat taken up from the cold reservoir to input work. However, for heating, the COP is the ratio of the magnitude of the heat given off to the hot reservoir (which is the heat taken up from the cold reservoir plus the input work) to the input work:
where
Note that the COP of a heat pump depends on its direction. The heat rejected to the hot sink is greater than the heat absorbed from the cold source, so the heating COP is greater by one than the cooling COP.
Theoretical performance limits[edit]
According to the first law of thermodynamics, after a full cycle of the process and thus .
Since , we obtain
For a heat pump operating at maximum theoretical efficiency (i.e. Carnot efficiency), it can be shown[7][6] that
and thus
where and are the thermodynamic temperatures of the hot and cold heat reservoirs, respectively.
At maximum theoretical efficiency, therefore
which is equal to the reciprocal of the thermal efficiency of an ideal heat engine, because a heat pump is a heat engine operating in reverse.[8]
Similarly, the COP of a refrigerator or air conditioner operating at maximum theoretical efficiency,
applies to heat pumps and applies to air conditioners and refrigerators.
Measured values for actual systems will always be significantly less than these theoretical maxima.
In Europe, the standard test conditions for ground source heat pump units use 308 K (35 °C; 95 °F) for and 273 K (0 °C; 32 °F) for . According to the above formula, the maximum theoretical COPs would be
Test results of the best systems are around 4.5. When measuring installed units over a whole season and accounting for the energy needed to pump water through the piping systems, seasonal COP's for heating are around 3.5 or less. This indicates room for further improvement.
The EU standard test conditions for an air source heat pump is at dry-bulb temperature of 20 °C (68 °F) for and 7 °C (44.6 °F) for .[9] Given sub-zero European winter temperatures, real world heating performance is significantly poorer than such standard COP figures imply.
As the formula shows, the COP of a heat pump system can be improved by reducing the temperature gap at which the system works. For a heating system this would mean two things:
Reducing the output temperature to around 30 °C (86 °F) which requires piped floor, wall or ceiling heating, or oversized water to air heaters.
Increasing the input temperature (e.g. by using an oversized ground source or by access to a solar-assisted thermal bank[10]).
Accurately determining thermal conductivity will allow for much more precise ground loop[11] or borehole sizing,[12] resulting in higher return temperatures and a more efficient system. For an air cooler, the COP could be improved by using ground water as an input instead of air, and by reducing the temperature drop on the output side by increasing the air flow. For both systems, also increasing the size of pipes and air canals would help to reduce noise and the energy consumption of pumps (and ventilators) by decreasing the speed of the fluid, which in turn lowers the Reynolds number and hence the turbulence (and noise) and the head loss (see hydraulic head). The heat pump itself can be improved by increasing the size of the internal heat exchangers, which in turn increases the efficiency (and the cost) relative to the power of the compressor, and also by reducing the system's internal temperature gap over the compressor. Obviously, this latter measure makes some heat pumps unsuitable to produce high temperatures, which means that a separate machine is needed for producing, e.g., hot tap water.
The COP of absorption chillers can be improved by adding a second or third stage. Double and triple effect chillers are significantly more efficient than single effect chillers, and can surpass a COP of 1. They require higher pressure and higher temperature steam, but this is still a relatively small 10 pounds of steam per hour per ton of cooling.[13]
Seasonal efficiency[edit]
A realistic indication of energy efficiency over an entire year can be achieved by using seasonal COP or seasonal coefficient of performance (SCOP) for heat. Seasonal energy efficiency ratio (SEER) is mostly used for air conditioning. SCOP is a new methodology which gives a better indication of expected real-life performance of heat pump technology. [14]
Seasonal energy efficiency ratio (SEER)
Seasonal thermal energy storage (STES)
Heating seasonal performance factor (HSPF)
Power usage effectiveness (PUE)
Thermal efficiency
Vapor-compression refrigeration
Air conditioner
HVAC
Heat pump and refrigeration cycle
^ Jump up to: a b "TE Technology Inc. Michigan USA" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2013-01-24. Retrieved 2013-10-16.
^ "COP (Coefficient of performance)". us.grundfos.com. Archived from the original on 2014-06-28. Retrieved 2019-04-08.
^ "Air Conditioning EER and COP". February 2018. Retrieved 9 October 2024.
^ "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2009-01-07. Retrieved 2013-10-16.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
^ "Coefficient of Performance – Measuring Efficiency in HVAC Systems". Fargo Heating and Cooling. 6 November 2023. Retrieved November 6, 2023.
^ Jump up to: a b Planck, M. (1945). Treatise on Thermodynamics. Dover Publications. p. §90 & §137. eqs.(39), (40), & (65).
^ Fermi, E. (1956). Thermodynamics. Dover Publications (still in print). p. 48. eq.(64).
^ Borgnakke, C., & Sonntag, R. (2013). The Second Law of Thermodynamics. In Fundamentals of Thermodynamics (8th ed., pp. 244-245). Wiley.
^ According to European Union COMMISSION DELEGATED REGULATION (EU) No 626/2011 ANNEX VII Table 2
^ "Thermal Banks store heat between seasons | Seasonal Heat Storage | Rechargeable Heat Battery | Energy Storage | Thermogeology | UTES | Solar recharge of heat batteries". www.icax.co.uk. Retrieved 2019-04-08.
^ "Soil Thermal Conductivity Testing". Carbon Zero Consulting. Retrieved 2019-04-08.
^ "GSHC Viability and Design". Carbon Zero Consulting. Retrieved 2019-04-08.
^ Department of Energy Advanced Manufacturing office. Paper DOE/GO-102012-3413. January 2012
^ "A new era of Seasonal Efficiency has begun" (PDF). Daikin.co.uk. Daikin. Archived from the original (PDF) on 31 July 2014. Retrieved 31 March 2015.
Discussion on changes to COP of a heat pump depending on input and output temperatures
See COP definition in Cap XII of the book Industrial Energy Management - Principles and Applications[permanent dead link]
🔐 Cryptographic Verification
Archived URL: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coefficient_of_performance
📄 CONTENT HASHES:
SHA-256: 921bf6fb94fc603ee913fce29e8d1bd2624c40319c5dc288ed210de3b8ecbef7
BLAKE2b: 1a50b69f5cff3feff8d2bdff3eacd7597bde9a4e9cfea7f8ad788380de963155
MD5: ae64f0fe7801ce206cccbb1e353b8f6c
📝 TITLE HASHES:
SHA-256: cc4d35472cde7d71d30de3125a028193aa2500403e0b8e78d767bf4a60662d3e
BLAKE2b: e7f78243ca61baa0c84c3054beff3e6911e2d82d55d88fd7561f3263eb7c7964
MD5: ea2428c6d2ff71f0b459fad834dc91dd
🔒 INTEGRITY HASHES:
SHA-256: 9ec6d9ee4b165c7f7a34567f527dfce332083e3e5979b589f581b57fadb1b858
BLAKE2b: ef525ac518924363bb63abf22fd9a5cb1ceb4d03a0863fb92d38c00451da02c8
MD5: 782c6768cbc741f25f51da90c2a105e7
Archived with ArcHive - Client-side cryptographic archival system