To me something is wrong with the idea that the order follower is more culpable than the order giver. When we hang a man for murder we don't hang him by his hands, but by his neck, cutting of the blood and oxygen to his brain where the will came from for s/he to murder. To me both the order giver and the order follower are guilty, both should pay equally for the crime. Just me.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from: