It's quite simple, you can either accept Dan's choice and reasons at face value....perhaps noticing that Steemit is one of the most remarkable and unique pieces of tech that has ever graced this planet, enabling free, uncersorable publishing for anyone with an internet connection. Or you can claim to know better...which is of course your right, not that it matters a hill of beans. I choose the former because Steemit is clearly not a complete solution to a whole world able to secure life, liberty and property, it is a part of the solution. There are thousands of others who can take Steemit to where it needs to be. Dan better serves himself and everyone else by continuing to innovate and launch other parts of the solution.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
"accept Dan's choice and reasons at face value"
Well I am commenting under a post titled 'reading between the lines...?'.
"the most remarkable and unique pieces of tech that has ever graced this planet, enabling free, uncersorable publishing for anyone with an internet connection."
That quote is hyperbolic to say the least. I'm not trying to slam the guy, I'm just saying he isn't perfect and his vision had issues and continues to have them. His departure at this point seems premature.