• Sign in
  • Sign up 
  • Welcome
  • FAQ
  • Block Explorer 
  • Night Mode
  • Stolen Accounts Recovery 
  • Change Account Password 
  • Vote for Witnesses 
  • Hive Proposals 
  • OpenHive Chat 
  • Developer Portal 
  • Hive Whitepaper 
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
logo
  • Posts
  • Proposals
  • Witnesses
  • Our dApps
LoginSign up
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Why does steem use this canonical thing instead of strict secp256k1?

  • View the full context
  • View the direct parent
bilthon-83 (45)in #beyondbitcoin • 9 years ago

I believe signatures will be different every time and that is expected, since we're dealing with non-deterministic signatures here.

Anyways, xeroc'x post over there is how I managed to solve this in graphenej. The relevant part of the code is in here: https://github.com/kenCode-de/graphenej/blob/master/graphenej/src/main/java/de/bitsharesmunich/graphenej/Transaction.java#L142

9 years ago in #beyondbitcoin by bilthon-83 (45)
$0.83
  • Past Payouts $0.83
  • - Author $0.63
  • - Curators $0.20
52 votes
  • fuzzyvest: $0.37
  • xeroc: $0.18
  • rossco99: $0.10
  • roelandp: $0.06
  • good-karma: $0.03
  • blakemiles84: $0.03
  • wang: $0.01
  • theshell: $0.01
  • faddat: $0.01
  • gomeravibz: $0.01
  • tracemayer: $0.00
  • jamtaylor: $0.00
  • michaelx: $0.00
  • bitcoiner: $0.00
  • pheonike: $0.00
  • pairmike: $0.00
  • skapaneas: $0.00
  • albertogm: $0.00
  • ratel: $0.00
  • phenom: $0.00
  • and 32 more
Reply 1
Sort:  
  • Trending
    • Trending
    • Votes
    • Age
  • [-]
    faddat (66)
     9 years ago  

    Should it be simpler?

    And thanks.

    $0.22
    • Past Payouts $0.22
    • - Author $0.17
    • - Curators $0.06
    1 vote
    • fuzzyvest: $0.22
    Reply