You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Not so @smartsteem: Transparency and adherence to rules required?

in #bidbot7 years ago

I never said delegators were not paid, however the actions here break the rules as laid down by smartsteem.

How can you justify that it is okay for you to break the rules that you set? Answer that question honestly

Sort:  

I never said delegators were not paid, however the actions here break the rules as laid down by smartsteem.

How can you justify that it is okay for you to break the rules that you set? Answer that question honestly

Of course I will answer this question honestly.

I believe in rules, when they make sense.

The 30 minute curation rule is in place to protect bidders from abusive users who are bidding in the last minute.

In my case - I only wanted to promote my post as fast as possible to help users who have no clue why Steemit was showing old data.

And since I was the only buyer for that part of the vote - I gave myself 0% ROI and promoted the post.

https://steemit.com/steemit/@therealwolf/did-we-develop-a-time-machine

And no - I will not remove the vote, because I paid for it.

I think you should change the name of the bot....I nominate the name 'One Rule' lol. What you have said is no justification. You have entry to a system that is not open to public use and you have abused the privilege.