RE: Bitcoin vs the negative

The one who write that article is either dumb or don't bother research. There're some mistakes or things that i don't like such as :

Bitcoin isn't anonymous, but only pseudonymous because the ledger is public and everyone can see it which means it's traceable.
Who would forget their things which are valuable.
There's no thing such as Bitcoin account or connect bitcoin to bank account directly.
He don't know if bitcoin fraction can be increased by adding more zero after period (.)
I think he blame bitcoin because he use crappy centralized wallet/service.

I think he's not only against bitcoin, but also don't bother do research or even understand what he's doing.