What are you talking about exactly? ETH is inferior? Than BTC whose fees were about 20$ for a transaction last year? Don't make me laugh. BTC transfers is slow and expensive. It is just a prototype, the first of the kind. Yet some people still value it over the other technologically superior derivatives, which is not smart. Prove me wrong.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Eth is inferior because: [1] it tries to do general (meaningful) computation in the blockchain. Which is insane waste ( cf.: http://www.truthcoin.info/blog/pow-cheapest/ by Paul Sztorc - extremely educational, eye-openner material. very big rarity to read such a literate analysis ), [2] it is a hierarchic project serving its founders, I always say that a blockchain needs a firm as much as a fish needs bicycle, [3] BTC just works, ETH promises to do something for years, and ... doesn't do anything. ICOs are not Eth app. Not unique feature but way to deflate Eth and to increase demand ... There is to much will into it. ... etc.
Well, look up ERC20 tokens then, mate. Can BTC provide anything like that? No and it never will. ETH will eventually dominate thee market, as it should.
I looked more throughly ERC20 standard. I see no diff. from Omni. Technically. Marketing effort-wise, yes. But this is extra-chain thing.