Haha, worked very well indeed, the blockchain divided followed by a crash. I think a hard fork should only be used to save the network from a real disaster. Also the fork to increase the block size is bullshit at the moment. They should focus on updates that make the blocks more efficient and off blockchain applications. When they wait till it is really urgent to hard fork, the agreement rate under the miners will be much bigger and the risk of the fork smaller. Im happy till now the Bitcoin community is conservative in using hard forks and thats a strength!
Working out well? ETC has twice as much trading volume on Polo as ETH. Imagine if that kind of thing started happening with bitcoin? We're just getting into serious adoption, let's not screw it up.
Haha, worked very well indeed, the blockchain divided followed by a crash. I think a hard fork should only be used to save the network from a real disaster. Also the fork to increase the block size is bullshit at the moment. They should focus on updates that make the blocks more efficient and off blockchain applications. When they wait till it is really urgent to hard fork, the agreement rate under the miners will be much bigger and the risk of the fork smaller. Im happy till now the Bitcoin community is conservative in using hard forks and thats a strength!
Working out well? ETC has twice as much trading volume on Polo as ETH. Imagine if that kind of thing started happening with bitcoin? We're just getting into serious adoption, let's not screw it up.
That wont happen.
I sense high degree of sarcasm here.
NOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!! ethereum made it and they have created etc which is a "mess". I dont want to see another bitcoins or should I name it BUTTCOINS.